LimitBreak Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 10 Bit HEVC 4K Encode and Decode provides 4K editing and watching capabilities to the masses. Also will support VP9 10 bit hardware decode and 8 bit VP9 hardware Encode for Youtube consumption. If you have the Samsung NX1 or NX500 and want to edit on the go, this might be useful for you. Source: http://www.anandtech.com/show/10610/intel-announces-7th-gen-kaby-lake-14nm-plus-six-notebook-skus-desktop-coming-in-january/3 "There's also HDR and wide color gamut support, but Intel says it's up to manufacturers to implement the two competing HDR standards, Dolby Vision and HDR10. On top of just letting you watch more 4K video, the new chips' encoding performance could be a huge deal for anyone editing media, with speeds between 1X and 3X real-time for 30FPS 4K. Source: https://www.engadget.com/2016/08/30/intel-7th-generation-core-cpus/" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBounce Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 1 hour ago, LimitBreak said: 10 Bit HEVC 4K Encode and Decode provides 4K editing and watching capabilities to the masses. Also will support VP9 10 bit hardware decode and 8 bit VP9 hardware Encode for Youtube consumption. If you have the Samsung NX1 or NX500 and want to edit on the go, this might be useful for you. Source: http://www.anandtech.com/show/10610/intel-announces-7th-gen-kaby-lake-14nm-plus-six-notebook-skus-desktop-coming-in-january/3 "There's also HDR and wide color gamut support, but Intel says it's up to manufacturers to implement the two competing HDR standards, Dolby Vision and HDR10. On top of just letting you watch more 4K video, the new chips' encoding performance could be a huge deal for anyone editing media, with speeds between 1X and 3X real-time for 30FPS 4K. Source: https://www.engadget.com/2016/08/30/intel-7th-generation-core-cpus/" Samsung was ahead of it's time with the NX1... Too bad they got out of the DSLR business. They showed real promise. Kisaha and Marco Tecno 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MountneerMan Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 "HEVC decode designed to meet 4kp60 real-time (RT) at up to 120 Mbps" Is it just me or does this seam way too low bit rate for 60p? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntblowz Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 15 minutes ago, MountneerMan said: "HEVC decode designed to meet 4kp60 real-time (RT) at up to 120 Mbps" Is it just me or does this seam way too low bit rate for 60p? HEVC is like double the current compression in terms of the efficiency, so 120Mbps will be equal to 240Mbps in H.264 MountneerMan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 RIP Samsung, you were way ahead of your time. Too smart for your own good! Kisaha and Marco Tecno 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Mason Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 HEVC/H.265 was not suitable for and was not designed as an acquisition format, it's too computationally intensive for both encoding and decoding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted August 30, 2016 Administrators Share Posted August 30, 2016 5 minutes ago, Luke Mason said: HEVC/H.265 was not suitable for and was not designed as an acquisition format, it's too computationally intensive for both encoding and decoding. I see where you're coming from but... That is the same as saying H.264 wasn't designed as an acquisition format, yet now it's the basis for Sony XAVC and Canon XF codecs. As long as H.265 has the hardware encoder / decoder chips to support it there's no reason why it can't be an acquisition format and an edit-ready codec. MountneerMan, Marco Tecno and Kisaha 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Tecno Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 120mb is definitely too low for nx1 with the hack, which easily reaches 160-180mb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Mason Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 42 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said: I see where you're coming from but... That is the same as saying H.264 wasn't designed as an acquisition format, yet now it's the basis for Sony XAVC and Canon XF codecs. As long as H.265 has the hardware encoder / decoder chips to support it there's no reason why it can't be an acquisition format and an edit-ready codec. You said it yourself, H264 is the basis of XAVC and XF-AVC, there were a lot of changes made to them and they are distinctively different from consumer H.264 designed for exhibition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MountneerMan Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 Personally I don't have any issue with using H.265 or H.264. I have an NX1 and love the image it gives. The thing that has always bothered me is the fact that I film with HEVC and usually deliver in H.264 witch is theoretically less compression and it "should" be the other way around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.