Dave Del Real Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 hour ago, tomsemiterrific said: Latest video--shot with 1DXii in EOSHD C-log, graded in FCPX with Color Finale Nice, what were your exposure settings? Souto and tomsemiterrific 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsemiterrific Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 2 minutes ago, Dave Del Real said: Nice, what were your exposure settings? Thanks. The light was pretty varied. All these shots were hand held using the old war horse 24-105 f4 L lens. I shot off the histogram and mainly tried to keep my highs below 70-80 IRE. On the exposure gauge that usually meant I was shooting -3, or below 0. But I've also shot standard exposure, putting my F-stop where I want it and using auto ISO---and the footage came out fine. I only changed to manual ISO when my highs were pushing over 80 IRE--and that has worked very well. The key as far as I can tell are the LUTS. Reid's three LUTS vary in how they adjust exposure, and one of the three is mostly likely to work well. I used a Canon LUT that they produced for the C300 Mk II---lots of punchy and beautiful color there. Reid's C-Log works a treat, as they say on the other side of our pond. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarantinofan Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Why $30 for a Canon C picture profile? Why $10? Even if the Canon C works well with Canon C lut packs, I still wonder if it can practically work on Adobe software. $30 marked down to $10 sounds fishy, it should be free or even up to $5. Even if you got bills, it still would be worth more if the price got cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted November 29, 2016 Author Administrators Share Posted November 29, 2016 On 28/11/2016 at 6:53 AM, Tarantinofan said: Why $30 for a Canon C picture profile? Why $10? Even if the Canon C works well with Canon C lut packs, I still wonder if it can practically work on Adobe software. $30 marked down to $10 sounds fishy, it should be free or even up to $5. Even if you got bills, it still would be worth more if the price got cut. Jesus christ, some people are so cheap. When Sony first introduced S-LOG they charged something like $5000 for it. And you think $10 is too much. Go spend it on a pizza instead fat boy!! JazzBox 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 What kind of pizza would you suggest, though? Guess you would avoid green peppers and yellow pineapple in favor of some lovely blue cheese, proscuitto crudo and tomatoes? (Because you know, talk about food makes me hungry ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted November 29, 2016 Author Administrators Share Posted November 29, 2016 I think he should spend it on a green and yellow spinach & mozzarella. Tomatoes probably too magenta for him. Cinegain, kaylee and JazzBox 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 Would it be possible to make a profile or set of profiles that sacrifices some DR in the highlghts in order to improve the rolloff? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaylee Posted December 1, 2016 Share Posted December 1, 2016 mmmmm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted December 1, 2016 Share Posted December 1, 2016 Barbaric! Who eats pizza without toppings?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted December 1, 2016 Author Administrators Share Posted December 1, 2016 Looks like you've found the reference image Sony's engineers used for skintones. Maybe Magic Lantern can hack the pizza and reverse engineer the cheese to make it look more appetising? Then Sony can take delivery from the pizza boy and start all over again. Ricardo Constantino, Ehetyz, Nikkor and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hijodeibn Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 @Andrew Reid sorry if it was already answered but did´t have the time to read the whole topic, since this was made to bring C-log to DLSR, is there any benefit using in a C100?, can it be loaded in the C line cameras?, if not, is the package including any LUT´s that could be used with Canon original C-log in post to get some specific results with skintones?, thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigfoot Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 anyone tried with the Eos m5 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted December 5, 2016 Author Administrators Share Posted December 5, 2016 On 12/2/2016 at 2:02 PM, hijodeibn said: can it be loaded in the C line cameras? Cinema EOS cameras don't need C-LOG as they already have Canon LOG. The LUTs in the C-LOG pack do work with Canon LOG on the Cinema EOS cameras as well. I tested them fully with official Canon LOG on my 1D C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Su Tran Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 Just got this pack the other day. For some reason, when I record video on my EOS M3, it shows the picture profile, but when I try to view it on my computer, it comes out like it was on the standard picture profile. Can you help? I am on the Manual Exposure selection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
julienajarry Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 Does anyone have any side by side comparisons of Andrews CLog to James Millers? I would happily grab Andrews and do the comparison on my 1DX mark ii if there is not. Liam 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 3 hours ago, julienajarry said: Does anyone have any side by side comparisons of Andrews CLog to James Millers? I would happily grab Andrews and do the comparison on my 1DX mark ii if there is not. haven't seen any. do you have/enjoy James Miller's? julienajarry 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
julienajarry Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 3 hours ago, Liam said: haven't seen any. do you have/enjoy James Miller's? I do really enjoy it but interested how Andrew's compares - I would use the better. You can see a few examples here: Liam 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 18 minutes ago, julienajarry said: I do really enjoy it but interested how Andrew's compares - I would use the better. You can see a few examples here: Those look nice. I like Andrew's a lot, and his additional profiles and LUTs are great too. Could be fun to see how they compare, but I wouldn't want to nitpick too much between them if they're both good for skintones and dynamic range and using LUTs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
julienajarry Posted December 20, 2016 Share Posted December 20, 2016 6 minutes ago, Liam said: Those look nice. I like Andrew's a lot, and his additional profiles and LUTs are great too. Could be fun to see how they compare, but I wouldn't want to nitpick too much between them if they're both good for skintones and dynamic range and using LUTs So this is by no means a great comparison, it's a very quick one on a 5D3. Same WB, settings, etc. James Miller's is cooler and flatter IMO. Andrew's is warmer as a touch less flat in this situation. I need to dial these in and get more in depth on the 1DX mark ii but my quick thought it I like James Millers. Andrew's in first and James's second. alvinlu 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanku Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 I'm pretty new to video, am mainly a photographer and have been lurking on EOSHD for a while. Lately I've been trying Andrew's LOG and LUTs on the 5D IV in 1080p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.