EduPortas Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 5 hours ago, JazzBox said: ... I was shocked from EOSHD C-Log at 3200 ISO with my father's 6D, really clean, no bad colors, no noise etc... Of course less resolution then GH4, but for narrative etc... it is very organic and "filmic". If you have suggestion I'm here I agree. I prefer the dual-pixel focusing system on my 7D MII, but the 6D is no slouch. Definetly a different "look". If you can jump for C100, go for it. Seems like a much better deal now that the newer version is available. Maybe even the XC10, as other users have said. Big increase in overall quality. mercer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 The XC10 is an amazingly underrated camera. That camera has made me reconsider my purchases or plans of other cameras. If it wasn't for my love of shallow depth of field, I would be happy enough with that camera for the next year. If I had more money, I would buy a C100ii to fill the shallow depth of field gap the XC10 lacks. Instead, I will most likely be buying an 80D to handle the close ups. With my newly acquired Canon 35mm f2 lens and the 80D's DPAF, I should have a nice two cam set up with brilliant Canon colors and AF and reliable Canon tech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JazzBox Posted September 30, 2016 Author Share Posted September 30, 2016 Yesterday evening I borrowed my father's Canon (5D MkIII and 6D) in order to test them. I shot a little test - nothing scientific - just to see how well C-Log works on them and I added GH4 (my main camera) in the test. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.