Emanuel Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 shooter, nffclml2ppl, jonpais and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JazzBox Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 Very good quality! I only see some jerky movements here and there with slow motion, especially when the camera is pointed down (but maybe it is the compression from youtube) and some strange reflections when backlight, for the rest it is really impressive! nffclml2ppl, Emanuel and shooter 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 My perspective as well :-) This one seems legit too: BTW, here's already accessories offer: JazzBox, nffclml2ppl and shooter 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitris Stasinos Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 On 9/10/2016 at 11:28 AM, Emanuel said: Actually this is the best footage i have seen so far from the mavic pro. These images have the right amount of sharpness to my eyes. Also in the statue shot we can finally see the advantage of bigger focal length / shallower depth of field, as selective focus is not an option for a P4 owner. This is an example of how an experienced user can show the true potential of a product. nffclml2ppl and shooter 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 24 minutes ago, Dimitris Stasinos said: Actually this is the best footage i have seen so far from the mavic pro. These images have the right amount of sharpness to my eyes. Also in the statue shot we can finally see the advantage of bigger focal length / shallower depth of field, as selective focus is not an option for a P4 owner. This is an example of how an experienced user can show the true potential of a product. Yes, indeed. One of the lighthouse shots (at 1:14) is pretty representative of such feature. Actually, the add-on is evident for that particular shot, comparing to the previous ones immediately before. Finer narrative tool. nffclml2ppl and shooter 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 nffclml2ppl and shooter 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Still from DJI's Lisbon event... shooter and nffclml2ppl 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gt3rs Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 A camera comparison here: It seems that the Mavic files are less cooked, less sharpening and less noise reduction and it is a good thing assuming that this is a valid test (same settings, etc...) shooter, nffclml2ppl and Emanuel 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 One of these days you'll be interested to take a look on this one... shooter and nffclml2ppl 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 shooter 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 "sharpened and edited version": shooter 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 Yeah, that stuff is definitly off. I can't be charmed by it, I'm afraid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 Look at those colors, look at the stuff in the distance: Of course, it's a class of difference. But that just hits the spot with me. That resonates. But even Phantom 4 footage does. Casey Neistat. He started using his Phantom again, after having lost his Mavic Pro... ( Casey, Casey, Casey...) I found the footage instantly much better. I've talked about it before... the stability, the color, the rendering of objects further than the plane of the subject. It looks off to me on the Mavic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBounce Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 6 minutes ago, Cinegain said: Look at those colors, look at the stuff in the distance: Of course, it's a class of difference. But that just hits the spot with me. That resonates. But even Phantom 4 footage does. Casey Neistat. He started using his Phantom again, after having lost his Mavic Pro... ( Casey, Casey, Casey...) I found the footage instantly much better. I've talked about it before... the stability, the color, the rendering of objects further than the plane of the subject. It looks off to me on the Mavic. How is this 4k@60p? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 Just now, DBounce said: How is this 4k@60p? It's 4K30 twixtored to 60p. 3 minutes ago, nffclml2ppl said: Nope. Very videoy. Mavic looks like film instead. Really think so, huh? Well. I'm with Luke on this one! The 4K high detailed and 60p are terrific on aerial stuff! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 You know what. I actually liked the Phantom when you'd just hook up a GoPro. * note how relatively ancient these video are... already an awesome job back then. I guess we just have the prizes, compact size and level of automization now, but for me the Mavic's image is a step back Not much wrong with the Phantom 4 either though, like in all previous non-Mavic Casey vlogs, or e.g.: Fredrik Lyhne 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 I love the BMPCC look. It's very low-fi S16 filmic sorta speak. But I don't like mushy aerial shots. It just doesn't feel right. There's nothing filmic about it to me. It's like lowres spycam footage with ugly color. Just makes me want to puke almost. But izallgud. To each their own. I guess it's the other way around as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shooter Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 2 hours ago, Cinegain said: footage with ugly color. That makes no sense. There's D-Log. At the end, there's no ugly color these days anymore. 1 hour ago, nffclml2ppl said: you must take those terrible sharp edges for terrific hehe Nature landscape, no problem. Building edges are terrible though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fredrik Lyhne Posted October 16, 2016 Share Posted October 16, 2016 13 hours ago, Cinegain said: You know what. I actually liked the Phantom when you'd just hook up a GoPro. * note how relatively ancient these video are... already an awesome job back then. I guess we just have the prizes, compact size and level of automization now, but for me the Mavic's image is a step back Not much wrong with the Phantom 4 either though, like in all previous non-Mavic Casey vlogs, or e.g.: The Gopro and Phantom 4 look better to my eyes too. Cinegain 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photographer-at-large Posted October 16, 2016 Share Posted October 16, 2016 What's the latest regulations for flying these UAVs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.