tugela Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 If it is actual 20 mpixel images in fine jpeg at 24 fps, that is better than bmmcc raw is it not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted October 23, 2016 Super Members Share Posted October 23, 2016 It would be cool, but for me I rather have raw and the perks that come with it as opposed to jpeg compression. Either way, using still sequences for video is a typical feature that I would use once or twice for fun and never again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JurijTurnsek Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Isn't it 24fps RAW too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Mason Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 17 hours ago, Vladimir said: damn, i believed till the end its shooting 24fps of raw and folowed the news( is it true that it shoots 6 secs of FineJpeg not 6 secs of RAW? I thought it gonna be my second and a last cam i need) Seems im gonna stick with bmmcc for that and gonna shooting videoblog without 180 degree flipping screen (actually now its without any of screen, gonna do it really-old-style with only measured distance ) They shot JPEG because no software can process the RAW files from RX100 V yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Luke Mason said: They shot JPEG because no software can process the RAW files from RX100 V yet. which is not a reason not to try such crucial option i belive) the camera itself still capable of shooting raw continious even if there is no software for decoding at the moment, right?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Mason Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Vladimir said: which is not a reason not to try such crucial option i belive) the camera itself still capable of shooting raw continious even if there is no software for decoding at the moment, right?) It is capable. But if they shot RAW, you wouldn't be seeing a video at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 3 hours ago, Luke Mason said: It is capable. But if they shot RAW, you wouldn't be seeing a video at all. but if so - i would know duration of that shooting. Which is waay more important for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 1 hour ago, Vladimir said: but if so - i would know duration of that shooting. Which is waay more important for now. Buffer handles 150 RAW + JPEG images, so it means 6 seconds @25fps, over 6 seconds @24fps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tugela Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 So, more frames if just jpeg then? 20 mpixel frames at ~8 MB each with 24 bits is still better than HD raw, compression or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted October 24, 2016 Super Members Share Posted October 24, 2016 Its not better than raw if one wants the perks of raw that jpeg doesn't offer. Nothing is ever "better", it always depends on needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tugela Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 what perks does HD raw (with 1/4 the data of the 4K image) have over 1/3rd compressed 4K from jpegs? the Jpegs have more data. There is more information in them, compression or no compression. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 1 hour ago, tugela said: what perks does HD raw (with 1/4 the data of the 4K image) have over 1/3rd compressed 4K from jpegs? the Jpegs have more data. There is more information in them, compression or no compression. dunno. color information? 12bit vs 8bit? stuff like that i think 18 hours ago, Emanuel said: Buffer handles 150 RAW + JPEG images, so it means 6 seconds @25fps, over 6 seconds @24fps. is this information from official source? after some rough calculations i do believe more in imaging-resources which said it has 150 series for jpeg and 71 (3 secs, not exciting anymore) for raw. Im also thinkin about how fast raw cont. shooting will drain a battery) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 2 hours ago, Vladimir said: is this information from official source? after some rough calculations i do believe more in imaging-resources which said it has 150 series for jpeg and 71 (3 secs, not exciting anymore) for raw. Im also thinkin about how fast raw cont. shooting will drain a battery) Not official source, so far. It is spread all over the main reports on the release, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted October 25, 2016 Super Members Share Posted October 25, 2016 Flexible grading, change WB in post, non destructive color correction to name a few that to me would be very valuable on Sonys weird color issues. markr041 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tugela Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 8 hours ago, Vladimir said: dunno. color information? 12bit vs 8bit? stuff like that i think is this information from official source? after some rough calculations i do believe more in imaging-resources which said it has 150 series for jpeg and 71 (3 secs, not exciting anymore) for raw. Im also thinkin about how fast raw cont. shooting will drain a battery) jpegs from the RX100 are 24 bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JurijTurnsek Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 just a quick question: would you guys consider a RX smartphone, which would be as thick as a RX100, but only feature a prime lens? I love this idea, but the Panasonic CM1 didn't really get a lot of attention Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted October 25, 2016 Super Members Share Posted October 25, 2016 7 minutes ago, JurijTurnsek said: just a quick question: would you guys consider a RX smartphone, which would be as thick as a RX100, but only feature a prime lens? I love this idea, but the Panasonic CM1 didn't really get a lot of attention I had the CM1, it was a good phone with an awesome camera. Really nice concept. Only reason I switched was because Im in a 100% film fase with stills. I did a review as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted November 19, 2016 Share Posted November 19, 2016 Impressive... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted December 10, 2016 Share Posted December 10, 2016 My first attempt with slog2 and 120p... It's a little long and boring... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now