FS5 with RAW to O7Q vs Sony FS7 vs Canon C500 vs Canon C300 mark ii

[Ed_David]

Discuss

Friend did a test.  Need to see it.  What is the image quality difference with FS5 raw vs FS7 raw .

And then C300 mark ii and C500.  Dynamic range.  Sensativity.  And motion cadence.

I need to do some tests asap to see as well.

[IronFilm]

2 hours ago, Ed_David said:

What is the image quality difference with FS5 raw vs FS7 raw .

I'm going to take a wild guess and say.....   rather little? And FS5 did well. 

[jcs]

I would expect C300 II to have best DR (FS7 similar), motion, RS (6ms), clean blacks (latest FW) of the lot. Skintones and PDAF make a compelling argument for the additional cost.

[Kino]

Ed, you can watch the C500 in action in the current IMAX film, A Beautiful Planet, which was shot entirely on the C500 (and the 1DC for time-lapse):

There is also an interesting article in American Cinematographer on why they chose the C500's uncompressed 4K RAW over other cinema cameras that they tested:

http://www.theasc.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/AC-A-Beautiful-Planet.pdf

[mercer]

30 minutes ago, Kino said:

Ed, you can watch the C500 in action in the current IMAX film, A Beautiful Planet, which was shot entirely on the C500 (and the 1DC for time-lapse):

There is also an interesting article in American Cinematographer on why they chose the C500's uncompressed 4K RAW over other cinema cameras that they tested:

http://www.theasc.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/AC-A-Beautiful-Planet.pdf

Some of those Cooke videos you posted last month were gorgeous. And this is just another testament to the quality of both the C300 and the C500. 

[Dan Wake]

if you do the test be sure there are not vertical stripes and aliasing please.