liork Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 51 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said: I am trying to find out if IBIS on the A6500 is significantly better than the A7S II, so far I feel it is a bit better but nothing dramatic Indeed a bit better, far from the Olympus / Panasonic latest ibis. Does not give you smooth enough walking effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dustin Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 So I noticed Cinema5d has a preliminary review on the camera. Upon reading up on it and from this thread my thoughts are this. I understand the small form factor of the camera but why in the world would I want to buy a camera that that has a heat issue and the manufacturer knowingly issues the camera with a workaround mode. This doesn't solve the problem. I haven't used this or the a6300 but if I'm spending my money, I want something that will work where I won't have to worry about burning my hands. While I love what I've seen from Andrew's new profile for Sony cameras, so far I'm not sure I can justify purchasing a sony in the future. Unless this heat thing is overrated? (I realize this probably depends on shooting style/environment conditions on set etc.). jonpais and Cinegain 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotchtape Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Well I just ordered one. I want to see for myself! It really depends on what you're using it for and your own preferences. Right now nothing can touch the image sharpness and lowlight capability / dr for the price. It even has useable ibis and from what I have seen decent pdaf af. I just bought a panny g7 and the DR sucks compared to my Nikon d750. Not impressed at all at the shadow noise even at low ISO. All of these cameras have compromises so far. Xt2 no ibis and not good at low light, af good except no touch screen... Em1 ii from what I've seen doesn't seem to do anything well either. I assume the g80 etc still have crap dr and noise like g7, and terrible af tracking. This thread is already 5 pages long for a reason - the IQ from a6300 is mind blowing for the price. Except for the stupid issues, Sony could have made s huge splash like gh4 level. Everyone is secretly mad they didn't fix them because this camera could have been seriously awesome if they got rid of heat and RS. instead they released version 1.5 instead of a proper 2.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 I agree, it could've been. Like the X-T2 could've been if it had sensor stabilization and a vari-angle touchscreen. But that's just it. They're not seriously awesome and that's because they lack those refinements. Atleast the Fuji is reliable and delivers on the promise on paper, so you know what you're getting yourself into. The A6500 just seems a hot mess. Pardon the pun. Flynn and jonpais 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisaha Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 @scotchtape are you comparing g7 with 750?! Are you serious? And I am pretty sure G7's DR destroys completely the iphone 6's DR! The Fuji has exactly the same Sony sensor, how is it worst in low light? Image quality seems better with Fuji, Nikon+Fuji seem to squeeze better performance from the same Sony sensors, than Sony. You can't really say that a6500 has a touch screen either, all the reviews state that the touch screen can do 2-3 things (exactly those), and only 1 works ok. The new Olympus, from what you have read here and elsewhere seems like NOT a good camera (?!)?! And doesn't do anything right? G80 isn't like the best value for money camera right now?! This thread is about 6500, not the 6300. I agree with @Cinegain (again!) but the vari-angle screen is not a nessecity for me anymore, and the way I use my cameras (cage, handling e.t.c) it could easily be a nuisance. The flip up-down/selfie screens are perfectly fine for me, even though it was strange when they first introduced, but this is just my opinion ofcourse. jonpais 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 Yeah, the D750 is a fullframe beast and it renders so organically. A no- or minimal-crop 4K successor would be mighty tempting. As much as I like the M43 system, the sensor performance really makes me want to get something S35/APS-C sized for dynamic range, better detail 'n stills and noise performance at ISO800+. My D5300 is great and lenses could be kept reasonably compact, light and affordable... but it's just not mirrorless and 4K. The Sony A6500 and Fuji X-T2 are, but have their own things to be nittpicky about. So, you look at what M43 has to offer. Well... it offers not so great sensor performance. But that's just something you need to face, acknowledge and work around... which can be done, and in the end the system and bodies are awesome to work with and the cost of a G7 is next to nothing. About screens. There's a couple of reasons why I think the vari-angle screen is the way to go... if you have a tilt display that faces frontwards on top, it might be blocked by a hotshoe mounted microphone. If you have one that tilts down it hits a tripod (and generally speaking is the least favorable option, you can't even put the camera down like that). With a vari-angle display you can angle the camera 90 degrees sideways and still have the screen face you, allowing you for some inconspicuous and around-the-corner shots perhaps, you don't have to be behind the camera when you can be beside it. It's very useful for shooting stills in portrait mode. And... turn the screen around and put it back... it protects the display. To me, all considered, it's the implementation of a tilty flippy screen that makes the most sense. Possibly the weirdest implemention of a angular screen is found on the Pentax K-1. Imagine one of them motion flight simulators on hydraulic struts or a lunar lander. That's about the idea of it. It's almost as weird as Fuji's tilt/swivel screen... which I guess is implemented that way to atleast compensate for shooting in portrait orientation. But please just make it a vari-angle one... with full touch functionality already. Especially when selfies and vlogging are a thing now. The only thing that really speaks against a vari-angle screen is that it might eat up space around the side where you have your ports and might only be useful used in a certain position... or maybe you hate looking off to the side, not being in-line with the lens/sensor... or expanding your camera's size enveloppe. But you know, different people, different approaches. I certainly do see the vari-angle screen as the most versatile though. Maybe the A6700 will have a little make-over. New design, more dials and buttons, better grip, better materials and hardware, more room for better internals. No more heat issues. Neglectable rolling shutter effect. Vari-angle fullly functioning touchscreen with a menu re-do. Fixed default color profiles... then they can count me in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toxotis70 Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 some first tests with a6500 + kit lens , for skin tones... mercer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 51 minutes ago, toxotis70 said: some first tests with a6500 + kit lens , for skin tones... Cine4 looked pretty good. I just picked up the a6300 and am testing some different settings now myself. Thanks for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted December 27, 2016 Share Posted December 27, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Very interesting combo(s): Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I'd sincerely appreciate to see GH5 (have pre-ordered two units) ISO performance & those low light samples into the a6500 camp... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 More than this or that upgraded camera feature, the proof is in the pudding... Maybe that's just me but, these last two shots in the next clip, as for instance, justify a purchase, even from a GH5 early adopter... I see these little Sony a6300/a6500 as another ballpark, even to each its own though -- cameras are like women, there's no other, there's no the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I guess you still can't have the screen and EVF in "Sunny" mode when filming 4k can you? I doubt the 6500 has fixed this. Hard to film what you can't see on sunny days. I sold my A7Rii because of this. I'd be interested to see their A7Riii and if they have this overheating issue fixed once and for all. Kisaha 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Anyone actually used an A6300 or 500 for an actual video project shoot?? a short film, anything where you need the camera to operate all day?? I really wanted to go with on of these cameras but the overheating issue cripples theses cameras for serious projects. How can you take the risk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teddoman Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 21 hours ago, Charlie said: Anyone actually used an A6300 or 500 for an actual video project shoot?? a short film, anything where you need the camera to operate all day?? I really wanted to go with on of these cameras but the overheating issue cripples theses cameras for serious projects. How can you take the risk. It requires a workaround. I saw a thread the other day where someone ran their Sony camera for 5 hours straight using a dummy battery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 42 minutes ago, teddoman said: It requires a workaround. I saw a thread the other day where someone ran their Sony camera for 5 hours straight using a dummy battery. what thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teddoman Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 13 hours ago, Emanuel said: what thread? I tried to find it and couldn't, sorry. But I have come across people saying they have tried dummy batteries as a solution. There are youtube videos on it too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.