jonpais Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 12-100 f/4 IS PRO performs brilliantly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 24 minutes ago, jonpais said: The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 12-100 f/4 IS PRO performs brilliantly. That looks like the only lens many will ever need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herbert Massey Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 SlanderShot, a_reynolds and Flynn 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbp Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 7 hours ago, Herbert Massey said: I like the look of this video. Damn good job. 7 hours ago, dbp said: Neither the Gh5, or the GH4 did much for me on this video at all. Looks like a Sony VG-20! And I had a VG-20, and a VG-30, loved the concept, Hated the output! Yikes. Orangenz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Looks like some kind of 6k video is coming in the summer. Test of the GH5 in link, not a full one but some info. Seems they liked the AF. http://www.redsharknews.com/production/item/4366-panasonic-gh5-review-the-first-full-hands-on-report Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 More GH5 video tests from Personal View. http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/13179/gh5-panasonic-camera-from-anticipation-to-love-or-hate/p45 mechanicalEYE 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanveer Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 1 hour ago, webrunner5 said: More GH5 video tests from Personal View. http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/13179/gh5-panasonic-camera-from-anticipation-to-love-or-hate/p45 I noticed this one in Particular. It kind of proves what panasonic have been saying all along, that 'the autofocus is significantly better, and more noticeable for video'. And, this isn't even the final firmware. jonpais and Jimmy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Well it looks like I have been very wrong about AF if these videos are to be believed. I am amazed they have been able to boost it that much. Some real voodoo science going on here! I may Have to get one. deezid, Fritz Pierre and Orangenz 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dantheman Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 The autofocus test was at 60frames/sec on the gh5 and 24fps on the gh4, it has always been my understanding that if you shoot at a higher framerate the camera has more frames to work with per second to continuously adjust focus. They should have used the same framerate for both camera's to have a reliable comparison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangenz Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 1 hour ago, dantheman said: The autofocus test was at 60frames/sec on the gh5 and 24fps on the gh4, it has always been my understanding that if you shoot at a higher framerate the camera has more frames to work with per second to continuously adjust focus. They should have used the same framerate for both camera's to have a reliable comparison. I'm pretty sure that understanding is incorrect. The polling rate is not the same as the recorded fps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Lipetz Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted February 17, 2017 Author Administrators Share Posted February 17, 2017 Something is up with that one... No way the GH4 is that clean at ISO 6400. Fake test? deezid, jonpais and Orangenz 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbp Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Yeah, that tests actually looks noticably worse for the GH5 in low light, compared to the GH4. Certainly hope something is up with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Lipetz Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangenz Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 57 minutes ago, Ken Ross said: Makes no sense that the GH4 looked better at ISO 3200 & 6400. The GH4 never had a reputation for shooting that clean at those ISOs. Something isn't right. Sure looks like some kind of NR added. idynamic and iresolution maxed? The high iso with neat video looks like neat video has not been applied correctly - it's pulsing in and out. Makes it worse than not having it. Ken Ross, webrunner5 and deezid 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 Wow do they not see that pulsing? Jesus I had to stop watching it. Orangenz and deezid 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deezid Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 After playing around with the RAW files out of the GH5 (http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...onic-gh5A7.HTM) I definitely want a switch for turning off any processing like noise reduction (at least luma) and sharpening! The results speak for themself. Video would look amazing until ISO 1600 with incredible detail and very fine grain. Even better than any Blackmagic URSA 4K footage (thanks to way better dynamic range and high ISO capabilities) The samples were processed using RAW Therapee (AMAZE Debayering, Chroma noise reduction starting from ISO 1600 and bicubic scaling to 4096px (DCI) width) to emulate the internal downsampling. Link to full samples in full quality (download and watch at 100% using a proper viewer like faststone): DROPBOX ISO400 (low quality on the forum) jonpais 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 8 hours ago, Andrew Reid said: Something is up with that one... No way the GH4 is that clean at ISO 6400. Fake test? Yeah, denoising, very likely, once the source seems reliable at least: http://www.osamuhasegawa.com/ And fairly promising: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonpais Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 This left me breathless, almost in tears, so I just had to get this up here before anyone else. 6 hours ago, deezid said: After playing around with the RAW files out of the GH5 (http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...onic-gh5A7.HTM) I definitely want a switch for turning off any processing like noise reduction (at least luma) and sharpening! The results speak for themself. Video would look amazing until ISO 1600 with incredible detail and very fine grain. Even better than any Blackmagic URSA 4K footage (thanks to way better dynamic range and high ISO capabilities) The samples were processed using RAW Therapee (AMAZE Debayering, Chroma noise reduction starting from ISO 1600 and bicubic scaling to 4096px (DCI) width) to emulate the internal downsampling. Link to full samples in full quality (download and watch at 100% using a proper viewer like faststone): DROPBOX ISO400 (low quality on the forum) Your work looks great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.