Jump to content

Aputure 120d vs Studio Flashes


Nikkor
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm totally ignorant when it comes to lights. I was looking into studioflashes for stills but the whole deal with them is a PITA.

I remember seeing videos about the aputure 120d and that it was 1000W equivalent, would this be comparable to a 1000W strobe??? Because if it is (even if its just 700W equivalent) it would be a much better deal for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EOSHD Pro Color 5 for Sony cameras EOSHD Z LOG for Nikon CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

Strobes are measured in watt-seconds (not watts) and in guide numbers.

 

Guide numbers rate the actual illumination output of a strobe, while watt-seconds usually measure the electrical expenditure of a strobe's "power pack."  A watt-second is equivalent to the expenditure of power of one watt for one second.

 

So, a momentary flash from a 1,000 watt-second strobe is equivalent to leaving the shutter open for one full second with a 1,000 watt constant light source (all other variables being equal).  That's a lot of light.

 

Let's make another comparison between a 1,000 watt constant light with a 1,000 watt-second strobe.  If you shoot 24fps video with a 180-degree shutter, your shutter speed is 1/48th of a second.  So, shooting 24fps video with a 1,000 watt constant light is only yielding the equivalent of 1/48th of 1,000 watt-seconds -- only 20.8 watts-seconds.

 

Generally, if a monoblock strobe and a strobe with a separate power pack have the same watt-second rating, the monoblock will be brighter.  Monoblocks are more efficient because they have no head cable to incur line loss.

 

If you intend to do a lot of stills outdoors and/or shoot stills indoors with large sources (umbrellas, soft boxes), then you will probably be much happier with strobes.  Strobes are a lot more powerful than most constant sources, and strobes can freeze/sharpen action.

 

Strobes allow one to make daytime exteriors look dark, with a short shutter speed and short flash duration.  Most LED and fluorescent sources can't even come close to achieving this power/time density, and using focused tungsten and HMI sources to do the same would probably fry the subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • EOSHD Pro Color 5 for All Sony cameras
    EOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
    EOSHD Dynamic Range Enhancer for H.264/H.265
×
×
  • Create New...