Micah Mahaffey Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Not sure if this has been asked here before, but I am currently looking for cameras under $1000 to shoot a feature film on in 4k. The reason for such a cheap camera is I know my skill set, and I'm sure either can yield cinematic results once I get my hands on them. But, which one is better? And why? I'm either going to buy a used a6300 or a new g7. I'm just curious if there's anything about the g7 that makes it better than the a6300''s dynamic range, low light, and sensor size. I plan on using either with pro color so color isn't a huge problem. Just which one would you personally believe to be better suited for a feature film and why? Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonpais Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Any reason you're not considering the G80/85 with IBIS? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mahaffey Posted January 21, 2017 Author Share Posted January 21, 2017 5 minutes ago, jonpais said: Any reason you're not considering the G80/85 with IBIS? The the extra cost with lack of any significant improvement over the g7 other than stabilization which isnt a worry of mine. The extra cost of the a6300 almost seems worth it unless people think otherwise jonpais 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotchtape Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 For narrative probably a6300 unless it is an action film the the RS would kill it. I recently got the g7 and a6500. For my run and gun I am using the lowly g7. It is delivering some impressive results to me despite less DR. I am using it over a6500 because for most of my real estate stuff I do not need af-c and use the manual mode which has touch to focus af-s that is blazing fast. A6500 doesn't have this! Only full MF and af-c which doesn't work with adapted lenses (af- motor constantly engaged even if nothing is changing... Sure way to burn something out!) That being said, for low light urban the slog2 is great and I'm liking the images so far. I also think with more work the color from Sony can be shaped better. The g7 is useable as well though! Cost wise the g7 is just too good of a deal to pass up if you already have m43 lenses. The 4k downscaled to 1080p is very competitive for $500! Pixel peeping it will lose to a6500 but if you are watching a clip on YouTube you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference unless in extreme shots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viet Bach Bui Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 The A6300 has the better image, but you need to work around the overheating issue if you're shooting longish takes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elgabogomez Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 It really depends on your project and the things you already have, do you have m43 lenses? Canon, Nikon? Sony? A monitor is helpful avoiding overheating on a6300. What are you lighting with or is it available light. With lights both cameras will shine, with available light the 6300 is useable up to 6400 iso and more dynamic range. Wide angle is also a thing to consider, are you going to be in narrow places where you need a 24mm super35 angle of view or wider? Then adapted lenses with a speedbooster type adapter is the most economical route and the sony gives you wider easily. Also gets you easier shallow depth of field. Handheld is better on the Panasonic with less rolling shutter. Both can be small enough to "steal" shots you don't have permission to do. I haven't used the g7 but the gh4 can burn highlights faster. I might be "old school" but for narrative feature you shouldn't even consider autofocus unless maybe on gimbal or steadycam type shots, what looks good on the web looks really "robotic" on the big screen and is a distracting issue when you want people to follow a story. Good luck and plan ahead a lot, that is more important than the camera you use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Hey, You might want to read this... http://www.luczenczyncinematography.com/single-post/2016/08/12/Shooting-a-Short-Film-on-the-Sony-A6300 The thing was overheating and that is to me....a deal breaker for narrative shoots, imagine how ridiculous it would to stop your shoot and tell the cast that you have to take a break to let the camera "cool down"!!! Shame, I really wanted to go with Sony too! PS. Its not the only story I have read where the thing has been used on a real production. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_Harrison Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 G7 and put the difference towards some nice lenses. That being said, the sony will give you more "cinematic" results on account of it having log, but the higher price and overheating issues might not make it worthwhile for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hijodeibn Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 G7 all the way, the overheating issue and horribly skin tone of sony cameras is a strong reason to go with Panasonic, it is really an easy choice... IronFilm and jonpais 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mahaffey Posted January 22, 2017 Author Share Posted January 22, 2017 I ended up buying a used a6300 for $670 as it was such a great price. The extra dynamic range, larger sensor and low light is what made the difference worth it. I'm not worried about skin tone's as I plan on using Eos HD Pro Color with the Sony and that should solve that issue. Just wanted to say thank you everyone for your input!!! I seriously appreciate it! I was about to get a G7 but just needed that little extra that the Sony was offering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 Keep in mind rolling shutter can be an issue even outside of action and handheld. If your vision for the film involves quick pans, complex camera moves, or any objects that might move quickly through frame (cars, trains, a running person, etc) it'll be a noticable problem. Imagine something like Boogie Nights or Shaun of the Dead with huge rolling shutter skew. It would ruin half the movie. Overheating can be a real thorn too. When you need to wrap a location because they need you out at a certain time, but you can't get the shots you need because the camera has a flashing temperature warning, you might wish you'd forgone the better DR in favor of a camera that would run steadily through the day without hickups. Or when you're on your fifth take of a Ronin shot, everything's finally going perfect, and then your camera ruins the take? Your operator is going to be pissed, and rightly so. You'd better have an AC on set with an organized charging station too, or batteries are going to be an issue. A6300 burns through them like a mother. You either buy 3-4 and keep them charging, or buy 8-10 and make damn sure they're 100% before you come to set. Even then, you should bring two wall chargers. To me, Panasonic is just less hassle. Plus cheaper, so you can spend more on lights, lenses, art, locations, crew, and talent. jonpais and Cinegain 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotchtape Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 To be fair even with DSLR I always just use Sony np-f batteries externally with them. A6300 just needs extra work to maintain it's cool from what I've read - external everything and stick a cooling pad behind the monitor! Of course if you are working on a hot set then all bets are off. I agree that it is annoying, but for all of us low budgeters just think of all the low budget things we do to make things work... I should test and shoot more before saying anything but I'm not finding the skin tones from a6500 to be horrendous at all if you tweak the color settings and grade with luts. elgabogomez 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 In the end, the a6300 was the better choice. The a6300 is just a vastly better image than the G7. The G7 is good, really good, but if you don't mind the pitfalls of the a6300, then you will get a better image out of her... no question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samin Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 From very first post it was obvious you have made your choice before even asking jonpais and webrunner5 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 Don't you have an nx1..? Marco Tecno 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stab Posted January 23, 2017 Share Posted January 23, 2017 The G7 does not carry a signal through HDMI when recording. In other words, you can't use an external monitor with a G7. Now, shooting a Feature Film on a 3 inch LCD screen does not really seem to be a great idea in my opinion. Image quality is great though. Tim Fraser 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisaha Posted January 23, 2017 Share Posted January 23, 2017 Feature on such a camera is a stretch for me. I would be curious. I think Peter Greengrass uses a6300 with the 18-105 for the most intense Bourne moments, and when it is really cold on set. I heard he found the touch screen implementation of the a6500 too gimmicky for real world use, still he likes how the screen dims, it has a certain old school film quality, when you weren't sure what you got before all these film procedures. jase 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mckinise Posted January 23, 2017 Share Posted January 23, 2017 No matter how prepared you are for the project, there will always be a few instances where things just go awry. The 6300 has many pros, but reliability in the clutch is NOT one of them. The Panasonic G7 will give you that reliability you need when everything else is falling apart. TheRenaissanceMan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Tecno Posted January 23, 2017 Share Posted January 23, 2017 I remember your nice movie done with nx1. What happened to it? Imo it's still the best option among the mentioned ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hijodeibn Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 On 22 de enero de 2017 at 4:42 AM, Micah Mahaffey said: I ended up buying a used a6300 for $670 as it was such a great price. The extra dynamic range, larger sensor and low light is what made the difference worth it. I'm not worried about skin tone's as I plan on using Eos HD Pro Color with the Sony and that should solve that issue. Just wanted to say thank you everyone for your input!!! I seriously appreciate it! I was about to get a G7 but just needed that little extra that the Sony was offering. I wish you luck, I learned very early than on set reliability is the most important, you are going to face so many issues every day, I hope you already have a good team to support you, and it will be a very good idea to get a B camera, probably a friend can borrow you one, as Mckinise said before, on set everything could fall apart but not the camera, you cannot imagine the anxiety when the camera stop recording and everybody is looking at you asking what is going on…..I was lucky, my camera comeback after three reset!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.