squig Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 8 hours ago, mercer said: Yeah it's really something else. I also like Arri LUTS with it too, but I've been using them at 50% as a finishing LUT. It seems to crank up some shiny contrast within the textures... if that makes sense... If you guys wanna use Arri LUTS check out http://www.cinelogdcp.com/cinelogc-overview Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanriverprod Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 Jean-Baptiste Marcant shared these stunning shots of Rome. - Resolution : 3072x1024 px - Bits : 14 bpp Lossless - Aspect Ratio : 3:1 Also, lostfeliz on ml forum says that hdmi out monitoring is possible on higher res without lag for focusing but you only get 40% of the image on center. They were wondering if it might somehow be able to pan the area to get focus on other parts of the frame. (http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=19300.575) If anybody else wants to chime in on this development or where the experimental builds are in terms of preview on the higher res modes... mercer, jpfilmz, kaylee and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpfilmz Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 That latest 4-29-17 build broke my live view preview in modes above HD. No grey scale or anything. Hanriverprod 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 Has anybody tried a modest bump to 2.5k or 2.7k. I would love to be able to get 2.5k 2:39 working one day. Hell, even cinema 2K at 48-60p would get me off. 4 hours ago, squig said: If you guys wanna use Arri LUTS check out http://www.cinelogdcp.com/cinelogc-overview Yeah I need to test this, Hyalinejim swears by it. I'm pretty sure he uses it with Adobe, and it seems like it may be better designed for After Effects than Resolve, but since I am testing workflows right now, I am pretty much game for anything. Hanriverprod 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaylee Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 12 hours ago, squig said: I want to believe 14 hours ago, Zak Forsman said: shooting full frame raw has ruined me for other cameras post stuff!!! ? tweak, Hanriverprod, mercer and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 I don't know if this has been shown. Plz delete if it has. Hanriverprod and mercer 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squig Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 59 minutes ago, mercer said: Has anybody tried a modest bump to 2.5k or 2.7k. I would love to be able to get 2.5k 2:39 working one day. Hell, even cinema 2K at 48-60p would get me off. 2.7-2.8k 2.39:1 has been pretty solid with most builds. I'm getting 3k continuous (12bit lossless) with the latest build. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpc Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 8 hours ago, mercer said: Has anybody tried a modest bump to 2.5k or 2.7k. I would love to be able to get 2.5k 2:39 working one day. Hell, even cinema 2K at 48-60p would get me off. At 2K you'll be giving up the full frame benefits for a miniscule increase of pixel count (I deliberately don't say "resolution", it is likely you won't get true higher res at 1:1 2K as 1:1 puts much higher requirements on lens sharpness). It is almost certainly better to just upscale 1080p to 2K. Zak Forsman and mercer 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 5 hours ago, cpc said: At 2K you'll be giving up the full frame benefits for a miniscule increase of pixel count (I deliberately don't say "resolution", it is likely you won't get true higher res at 1:1 2K as 1:1 puts much higher requirements on lens sharpness). It is almost certainly better to just upscale 1080p to 2K. Good to know, thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zak Forsman Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 Question, if I want to try one of the high frame rates, do I need to set the Canon menu to 60/720p and then the ML FPS to 48 or 60 depending on the mode I've selected? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arikhan Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 @cpc Just beeing curious: How does the 1080p-ML-footage looks, when upscaled to 4K? Is the look better when A. You upscale to 4K in post or B. When you display the 1080p-ML-footage on a 4K TV (as most 4K TVs do a very good upscale of FullHD footage) ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squig Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 1 hour ago, Zak Forsman said: Question, if I want to try one of the high frame rates, do I need to set the Canon menu to 60/720p and then the ML FPS to 48 or 60 depending on the mode I've selected? Yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 21 minutes ago, squig said: Yeah. Does this require MLV Lite, or can the regular build handle a higher frame rate at a lower resolution? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squig Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 44 minutes ago, mercer said: Does this require MLV Lite, or can the regular build handle a higher frame rate at a lower resolution? Regular build can do lower res. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 21 hours ago, squig said: Regular build can do lower res. Thanks again, Squig. So just to be clear... set for 60/720 in Canon menu, then set FPS to 48 or 60, exact FPS, then change the resolution in ML to lower than 1080 and I assume it will let me know what resolution is even possible? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squig Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 10 hours ago, mercer said: Thanks again, Squig. So just to be clear... set for 60/720 in Canon menu, then set FPS to 48 or 60, exact FPS, then change the resolution in ML to lower than 1080 and I assume it will let me know what resolution is even possible? The resolution change is automatic in ML. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 7 minutes ago, squig said: The resolution change is automatic in ML. Yeah I noticed that. Tested it today. Pretty impressive for a less than 720p vertical resolution. I think I'll test the experimental build next week to see what I can get out of it. Have you tested any high resolution slow motion... even 48p is pretty slow... well slower than I thought it would look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squig Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 29 minutes ago, mercer said: Yeah I noticed that. Tested it today. Pretty impressive for a less than 720p vertical resolution. I think I'll test the experimental build next week to see what I can get out of it. Have you tested any high resolution slow motion... even 48p is pretty slow... well slower than I thought it would look. I haven't tested the high frame rates in the experimental builds. This is some 48p stuff I shot with a nightly build. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 11 minutes ago, squig said: I haven't tested the high frame rates in the experimental builds. This is some 48p stuff I shot with a nightly build. Man, your film looks awesome. webrunner5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squig Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 16 minutes ago, mercer said: Man, your film looks awesome. Thanks. Only 150,000 frames to go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.