cameraeye Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 On 3/12/2021 at 9:36 AM, ZEEK said: When you click record you can still switch between the two Famings so it's no issue. Once you get the hang of it it comes natural. A really good lens for these modes is the Canon 10-18mm. I don't have my 5D III to hand and may be missing something obvious, but how do you setup the switch between modes whilst filming? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FHDcrew Posted June 27, 2022 Share Posted June 27, 2022 Let’s revive this threat, shall we? Threads seem to die in these EOSHD sub forums. Anyone use ML RAW on a canon 70d? Just think, pair it with a sigma 18-35 and you have a cheap raw setup with dual pixel AF!! PannySVHS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted June 27, 2022 Share Posted June 27, 2022 21 hours ago, FHDcrew said: Let’s revive this threat, shall we? Threads seem to die in these EOSHD sub forums. Anyone use ML RAW on a canon 70d? Just think, pair it with a sigma 18-35 and you have a cheap raw setup with dual pixel AF!! I'm not optimistic about it staying alive very long in here, but anyway.... Is the 18-35 a good lens for AF? I had one on my 700D and when focusing (either PDAF in photo mode or CDAF in video) it was clunky and noisy and felt like it was made of stone-age clockwork. PannySVHS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PannySVHS Posted June 27, 2022 Share Posted June 27, 2022 Afaik, kye is right about clunkiness of AF when using the Sigma 18-35. Possibly a Tamron, Sigma or Canon 18-50 F2.8 could be a good choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FHDcrew Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 Woot. Thread revived. These sub forums are just sad. They get no love anymore. I’ve heard the one downfall of 70d ML RAW are some weird quirks with available resolutions, FPS override, etc. But it would be so interesting! I feel like all the ML RAW cameras have unique mojo, having that mojo plus decent AF, all in a sub $400 camera, would be amazing! I just don’t hear people use it very much. But this guy here got some BEAUTIFUL footage from it. I don’t see a reason to use this camera for ML RAW other than the dual pixel AF though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FHDcrew Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 PannySVHS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FHDcrew Posted June 28, 2022 Share Posted June 28, 2022 1 hour ago, PannySVHS said: Afaik, kye is right about clunkiness of AF when using the Sigma 18-35. Possibly a Tamron, Sigma or Canon 18-50 F2.8 could be a good choice. Didn’t expect that the sigma 18-35 would be clunky! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PannySVHS Posted June 30, 2022 Share Posted June 30, 2022 Iirc Andrew wrote about rather mediocore AF of the Sigma. I think in his videos, portrait style looks much better colour wise than what he got out of RAW lol. @FHDcrew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now