rokkimort Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Well, the title says it all. Looking for a USED, 4k PL mount camera, 1.5-1.6x crop sensor. This time my budget is much higher (the the last time I posted similar question) and I could in theory stretch it to 8k too. What I need: A ready-to-shoot package (body, monitor, media, power, tripod). I'm buying this for a project, a short, so will only shoot static-ish narrative with a tripod. Cameras I'm looking at: Ursa Mini or Ursa Mini pro (4.6k). Red One MX. Red Scarlet MX. Kinefinity Kinemini 4k. Would honestly buy Ursa right now, but am super scared of FPN and noise overall. Never used REDs, but heard that One MX and Scarlet MX both have worse DR then the Ursa and also suffer from noise issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tupp Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Consider renting. A $7000 budget for a camera package sans lenses seems rather excessive for a short. I've worked on shorts in which the budget for the entire project was a fraction of that of your camera (sans lenses) package. Plus, renting gives you more flexibility/recover-ability. If you rent a camera that has a problem (such as fpn) or if you just don't like it, you can return it and get another camera. Also, for a narrative short, you probably don't even need 4K, which could greatly reduce your budget. Justin Bacle, TheRenaissanceMan and EthanAlexander 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokkimort Posted September 18, 2017 Author Share Posted September 18, 2017 Thanks for the advice! I should clarify that I will keep shooting with whatever I buy in future, and consider this an investment. I live in a place where renting is not easy, and therefore not an option. So it's really about choosing what to buy: Ursa Mini Pro, Red One MX, Red Scarlet MX, Kinemini 4k, maybe EVA-1 will fit the budget too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tupp Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 There is nothing like lensrentals.com or borrowlenses.com where you are located? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonesy Jones Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 10 hours ago, rokkimort said: Would honestly buy Ursa right now, but am super scared of FPN and noise overall. I can tell you for certain that the UMPro does not suffer from FPN, unless you do something overly extreme in post. At first I thought I noticed FPN in the camera monitor. Upon playback it was clean as clean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 20 minutes ago, Jonesy Jones said: I can tell you for certain that the UMPro does not suffer from FPN, unless you do something overly extreme in post. At first I thought I noticed FPN in the camera monitor. Upon playback it was clean as clean. Do you still have an Ursa Pro? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonesy Jones Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 1 minute ago, mercer said: Do you still have an Ursa Pro? No. Sold it. I loved the image though. But downscaling to the awesome but less expensive GH5 was the way to go for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 29 minutes ago, Jonesy Jones said: No. Sold it. I loved the image though. But downscaling to the awesome but less expensive GH5 was the way to go for me. In your opinion, does the GH5 give you half the quality of the Ursa? More than half? Less than? Emanuel and webrunner5 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonpais Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 I'm guessing he's missing those built-in ND filters just a little. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 I'm guessing his rolleyes on Glenn's last entry... :-D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonesy Jones Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 2 hours ago, mercer said: In your opinion, does the GH5 give you half the quality of the Ursa? More than half? Less than? Tough to say. There's all the peripheral stuff you could point to like ND's and IBIS and size and so on. But image quality alone the UMPro obviously wins. But I will say that when I pulled out the GH5 for the first time I thought to myself, this looks nearly identical to how this would look if I were shooting with the UMPro. On further review I'd say the GH5 is 80-90% of the UMPro. My hope is that with filters, correct v log exposure, the right lut and better post, I can mitigate some of that last 10-20%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zerocool22 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 19 hours ago, rokkimort said: Well, the title says it all. Looking for a USED, 4k PL mount camera, 1.5-1.6x crop sensor. This time my budget is much higher (the the last time I posted similar question) and I could in theory stretch it to 8k too. What I need: A ready-to-shoot package (body, monitor, media, power, tripod). I'm buying this for a project, a short, so will only shoot static-ish narrative with a tripod. Cameras I'm looking at: Ursa Mini or Ursa Mini pro (4.6k). Red One MX. Red Scarlet MX. Kinefinity Kinemini 4k. Would honestly buy Ursa right now, but am super scared of FPN and noise overall. Never used REDs, but heard that One MX and Scarlet MX both have worse DR then the Ursa and also suffer from noise issues. The Ursa mini pro is the clear winner over here. If you expose well there is no FPN. Noise of ump seems to be better then a scarlet mx. Last time I shot with a scarlet mx, it had quite some noise. Didn't see that kind of noise on my ump yet. Under 10K the UMP is the best camera out there. I just came back from IBC, and checked out the C200 and the eva1, liked the image from the ump a lot more(couldn't do major tests though). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokkimort Posted September 19, 2017 Author Share Posted September 19, 2017 1 hour ago, zerocool22 said: The Ursa mini pro is the clear winner over here. If you expose well there is no FPN. Noise of ump seems to be better then a scarlet mx. Last time I shot with a scarlet mx, it had quite some noise. Didn't see that kind of noise on my ump yet. Under 10K the UMP is the best camera out there. I just came back from IBC, and checked out the C200 and the eva1, liked the image from the ump a lot more(couldn't do major tests though). This is great insight, thank you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisaha Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 After EVA1 and C200 announcement/release, the UMP seems like the best camera. No dual pixel touch focus though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 I'd forget about 4K, and get yourself a Sony PMW-F3 and save yourself a TONNE OF MONEY in the process! :-D As $7K is a stupidly large amount of money to spend on a camera with no commercial return on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fritz Pierre Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Completely agree with @IronFilm on this....$2000 yes....but $7000 or 10,000 or 20,000 has to pay for itself....good lenses are so much more important IMO to spend your money on, which is what I invest in long term...also +1 on the F3...a beautiful image for what you spend, if you want a Cine camera specifically, instead of a hybrid. Also the BMD micro camera produces a stunning image...far below the cost of $7000, as do a multitude of other cameras. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff CB Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 URSA pro is perfect if you don't underexpose. However I might consider the GH5 with a great lens set instead. I just wish the GH5 was super35. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokkimort Posted September 22, 2017 Author Share Posted September 22, 2017 GH5 produces videos, I don't like the footage I saw online, motion is not cinematic. I have just sold the Blackmagic Micro, yes it's nice, but I want to have 4k, so f3 also does not work for me. Right now it's down to Ursa Mini Pro vs Red Scarlet MX. If anyone has opinions about these cams – feel free to let me know. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonesy Jones Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 1 hour ago, rokkimort said: GH5 produces videos, I don't like the footage I saw online, motion is not cinematic. I have just sold the Blackmagic Micro, yes it's nice, but I want to have 4k, so f3 also does not work for me. Right now it's down to Ursa Mini Pro vs Red Scarlet MX. If anyone has opinions about these cams – feel free to let me know. Thanks. I think you're going to hate mx sensor. BM is not perfect either. Having used both I'd go with BM. Plenty others would say different. As much as I love BM and hate Canon the C200 is attractive if put in the right perspective. Still flawed though and there's no perfect cam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonpais Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 We’re trailblazers for sure. I’ve watched thousands of camera tests online, uploaded one or two lens comparisons and field tests myself shot with a handful of Lumix cameras, and not once have I heard anyone mention ‘cinematic motion’. I’ve never seen it come up in a single camera review either. Respected DPs have been using the GH* cameras for years now and I can’t recall any of them complaining about ‘motion cadence’. Likewise during the Zacuto shootout of 2012, where the lowly GH2 was up against the likes of the Arri Alexa, the Red Epic and the Sony F65. To the best of my knowledge, it’s not something that’s ever appeared in the literature of the leading camera manufacturers. The human ear is more sensitive to changes in audio frequency, but even though I’ve delivered videos shot at 23.976 as 24p, I’ve never come across anyone who’s even noticed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.