Emanuel Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 https://steadxp.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 I wonder how the cheap DJI mirrorless stabilizer works on a GH5s? The 129 dollar one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 20 minutes ago, webrunner5 said: I wonder how the cheap DJI mirrorless stabilizer works on a GH5s? The 129 dollar one. That is for phones / action cameras. Not mirrorless/DSLR webrunner5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 5 minutes ago, IronFilm said: That is for phones / action cameras. Not mirrorless/DSLR It is called a Ronin S. I heard it is going to be cheap as hell. I swore I seen 129 bucks for it projected. Actually both cost the same. https://www.digitalphotopro.com/newswire/dji-launches-osmo-mobile-2-ronin-s-stabilizers/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 You are thinking of the new Osmo which is $129 However:"Pricing hasn’t been set for the Ronin-S" No way will it be $129 as well! wolf33d 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mmmbeats Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 8 hours ago, Emanuel said: https://steadxp.com/ This is worth discussing. I remember seeing this technology touted a few years back. If it works it might be a good pairing with the GH5s. It's potentially a much better solution than using Warp Stabiliser on its own. Any views? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mmmbeats Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Hmmm... looks like it has a particularly cumbersome workflow. Also uses audio in to your camera - does that negate both channels? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 I am very intrigued of this. I am still on GH4. Sometimes I use a gimbal but as I prefer shooting anamorphic thats could be as solution as I think IBIS is a problem anyway? Hmmm... why is the workflow cumbersome? Found it in the FAQs - it is somewhat cumbersome! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PannySVHS Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Alert! A lot of the footage looks suspicious. Of the very few videos on vimeo, you can see some obvious fakes. In one of them the stabilized footage has a wider FOV than the shaky footage. Not nice. So, alert! Rudolf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted January 10, 2018 Author Share Posted January 10, 2018 51 minutes ago, PannySVHS said: Alert! A lot of the footage looks suspicious. Of the very few videos on vimeo, you can see some obvious fakes. In one of them the stabilized footage has a wider FOV than the shaky footage. Not nice. So, alert! Didn't check the official footage, but that one apparently comes from some user, so it should be reliable enough, no? :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PannySVHS Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 41 minutes ago, Emanuel said: Didn't check the official footage, but that one apparently comes from some user, so it should be reliable enough, no? :-) Posted example is interesting. Please note in the uncorrected raw footage, how there is almost no up and down shake in the y-axis above and below the model. Looks like filmer used the GH5 in stabilized mode on accident, rotating it on the z axis mostly. Ups and downs above and below the model look good enough in the raw footage already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zerocool22 Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Yeah the downside to this is that you have to use their software. I would love to see a plugin for resolve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted January 11, 2018 Author Share Posted January 11, 2018 I don't think there's anything strange on videos like this one here: https://vimeo.com/244689449 Besides the fact the owner seems pretty legit: https://vimeo.com/worksmanuelpalma/videos As much as the previous one BTW... They've just added their shaky side-by-side sample only not sync with. That's it. Hence to look like wider. Yes, it is. Not TC sync there. The first user also had some parts to really scream for a stab hand so... Everything seems fine to my eyes so far. Even though I had seen only those. PannySVHS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PannySVHS Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 8 minutes ago, Emanuel said: I don't think there's anything strange on videos like this one here: https://vimeo.com/244689449 Muaha, lol! Look at the stabilizied version, it has a wider fov than the unstabilized one. Muaha! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted January 11, 2018 Author Share Posted January 11, 2018 3 minutes ago, PannySVHS said: Muaha, lol! Look at the stabilizied version, it has a wider fov than the unstabilized one. Muaha! Right. But there's no sync between both sides on his side-by-side sample. Follow me now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PannySVHS Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 If it would not be in sync, there would not be much sense in posting. Even if not in sync, same 10mm lens and still wider fov on the stabilized footage. So this is wrong. I´m leaving this thread at this point now to leave space for others to discuss this and so I don´t cause this thread to bloat like the GH5s thread did.:) cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted January 11, 2018 Author Share Posted January 11, 2018 No worries. The point here is all about the product as fair alternative to the lack of IBIS on GH5S, not exactly these samples. If they give a fair idea of the outcome, it's not exactly a big deal to present themselves or one of them even if non-sync anyways. That said, we can extract the good part and respective findings from there. I also don't concur the shaky section of the previous example posted here could have been shot with IBIS on GH5 by accident as you wrote. If for a few part you may find it acceptable, that's merely merit by the camera operator hands of his setup circumstances; not else to my eyes. If so, we'd have a much more interesting solution beyond the native scope of this thread to even address footage shot on IBIS, go figure! : ) Sorry buddy but that's what they fairly tell me :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 For some reason you are suppose to use a fairly wide angle lens when using it. It does look interesting. And price is certainly cheaper than a normal Gimbal, and looks less Dorky using it LoL. 44 minutes ago, PannySVHS said: If it would not be in sync, there would not be much sense in posting. Even if not in sync, same 10mm lens and still wider fov on the stabilized footage. So this is wrong. I´m leaving this thread at this point now to leave space for others to discuss this and so I don´t cause this thread to bloat like the GH5s thread did.:) cheers Come on Panny We were hoping you would be the Ginnie Pig to buy it first and tell us about the results. PannySVHS and Emanuel 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted January 11, 2018 Author Share Posted January 11, 2018 29 minutes ago, webrunner5 said: Come on Panny We were hoping you would be the Ginnie Pig to buy it first and tell us about the results. Gotcha! My turn instead LOL : ) Shame my posts failed to convince him to go on my and in his own behalf ;-) PannySVHS and webrunner5 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefactory Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 From memory they recommend 1/250 shutter when using steadyxp. The claim that gives the best results. That would rule it out for many here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.