User Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 39 minutes ago, Damphousse said: Now DPAF is a different animal. 5 years ago you would be ridiculed as an amateur for even requesting any kind of autofocus. Now the "pros" tell us it is impossible to shoot a documentary without it. Oh? I'd be curious to hear who has said this. I'm mean, maybe for gimbal work. But if I heard this from a doc shooter, I would send them home to their mother. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 2 hours ago, JordanWright said: Hopefully so - a mini 4k c100 essentially Yeah, that would be pretty epic. The latest rumor I read was Canon may put out two versions... one with an EF mount and one with an EF-M mount. Hopefully they’ll release the two with different sensors... the ef-m with the one inch sensor and the EF with a S35mm... the EF version may just be the sequel to the C100ii everybody has been waiting for. Either way it seems like Canon could have an interesting year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damphousse Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 hour ago, User said: Oh? I'd be curious to hear who has said this. I'm mean, maybe for gimbal work. But if I heard this from a doc shooter, I would send them home to their mother. You are over analyzing a hyperbolic joke. The point is "pros" are sh-tting all over the GH5 because it lacks a feature they used to ridicule amateurs for enquiring about. Don't get me wrong. I love DPAF. It is just I've always found "pro" autofocus snobbery amusing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Oh I'm just 'over analyzing hyperbole' then. Whew. Good to have than sorted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damphousse Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 hour ago, User said: Oh I'm just 'over analyzing hyperbole' then. No. You are over analyzing a joke. A joke you didn't get. Which is okay. I was just explaining the joke to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 All good, thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 On 1/29/2018 at 6:15 AM, Robert Collins said: I seriously doubt it. The multi-aspect sensor is how the pixels are distributed and not the physical size of the sensor. The GH1 had a multi-aspect sensor and it had exactly the same size sensor as all the other M43 cameras. It was sporting an extra 100,000 pixels though. OK this is a pretty good explanation about the size difference I was talking about. Kisaha 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.