thebrothersthre3 Posted December 21, 2019 Share Posted December 21, 2019 2 hours ago, Video Hummus said: Ouch, lesson learned. This is also a quirk of the dual gain circuits on the Pocket and GH5S. Sometimes, on the GH5S, I get better results (noise wise) by bumping up the ISO to engage the "high" circuit and then adjust exposure down. I loose DR but in a lot of those cases DR doesn't matter that much (low-light or not a high DR scene). Yeah the high end of the low circuit looks terrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anonim Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 Wonderful movie shot on BMPCC and Voigtlander Noktons, presented in Cannes 2019. https://variety.com/2019/film/reviews/lillian-review-1203227609/ https://www.screendaily.com/reviews/lillian-cannes-review/5139633.article graphicnatured, osmanovic and seanzzxx 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanzzxx Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 Damn, that's some amazing cinematography. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Kuźniar Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 FYI the new BRAW plugin for Premiere 1.6.1 work a lot better, no more render issues and the panel doesnt seem to stop working as often as it did on 1.6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turboguard Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 4 hours ago, Adam Kuźniar said: FYI the new BRAW plugin for Premiere 1.6.1 work a lot better, no more render issues and the panel doesnt seem to stop working as often as it did on 1.6 Just curious, why not do your color in DaVinci? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anaconda_ Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 37 minutes ago, Turboguard said: Just curious, why not do your color in DaVinci? Although I'm not the person you asked, I often edit in Premiere and on those projects, I find it much easier to grade in Lumetri rather than round tripping. This way, you can do a rough edit, rough grade, fine tune the edit, adjust the grade, tweak the audio, tweak the grade, add titles, tweak the grade leave it over night, tweak the grade with fresh eyes and then export. I'm sure it's different for everyone, and workflows differ, but rarely am I totally happy with my first grade, and even if I think I am happy with it, watching the project again will prove myself wrong. If I had to roundtrip for every pass I'd waste even more time for not very much gain. For this reason, when I can I also edit in Resolve, but due to client criteria, that's not always possible. I'm also much quicker with Premiere than I am with Resolve and when your workflow wastes as much time as mine, claiming back as many seconds as you can really helps. Turboguard, MurtlandPhoto and Adam Kuźniar 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Kuźniar Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 12 hours ago, Turboguard said: Just curious, why not do your color in DaVinci? All I really do on this project is mess around with the RAW settings, slap the FilmConvert on and call it a day and I don't really want to buy another version just for Resolve. Plus I'm so much faster editing multicam shoots in Premiere than I am in Resolve and if I can keep the entire project to one program I will Turboguard 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Does anyone know the exact crop in the super 16 mode? And does anyone know how much battery life you get with the battery grip? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 14 hours ago, mercer said: Does anyone know the exact crop in the super 16 mode? This thing looks useful... So, S16 looks like it's a diagonal of 14.33 and FF is 43.27, which makes the crop factor of 3.02 mercer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 22 minutes ago, kye said: So, S16 looks like it's a diagonal of 14.33 and FF is 43.27, which makes the crop factor of 3.02 Thanks, I asked because the OG Pocket was often referred to as having a S16 sized sensor but the actual crop factor was a touch less at 2.88x so I wasn't sure if BM followed the traditional S16 crop in the P4K or the OG Pocket crop of 2.88x. kye 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 4 minutes ago, mercer said: Thanks, I asked because the OG Pocket was often referred to as having a S16 sized sensor but the actual crop factor was a touch less at 2.88x so I wasn't sure if BM followed the traditional S16 crop in the P4K or the OG Pocket crop of 2.88x. They're so close to each other I'd suggest confirming somehow, rather than relying on the accuracy of their marketing department! mercer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anaconda_ Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 Oh man, I just sold my OG Pocket, otherwise I could have checked and compared for you. Sorry about that. Hopefully someone else around here can double check it. mercer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 17 minutes ago, kye said: They're so close to each other I'd suggest confirming somehow, rather than relying on the accuracy of their marketing department! With the original they were at the mercy of the sensor but with the P4K its a specific crop they created, so one would assume they chose the traditional S16mm size... maybe @CaptainHook knows? I find this mode very intriguing because it opens up a slew of lens options that could soften the look of the P4K. I don't know if you've seen any footage from the Alexa S16 mode but it's pretty gorgeous. 11 minutes ago, Anaconda_ said: Oh man, I just sold my OG Pocket, otherwise I could have checked and compared for you. Sorry about that. Hopefully someone else around here can double check it. I appreciate the sentiment. Weirdly enough, I haven't found one sample from the new S16 mode online... I would have thought it would be a pretty big deal since a lot of members at bmcuser were petitioning for that mode since the camera was announced. Also, is the S16 crop mode only in BRaw or is it also available for ProRes? And will regular SDXC cards work in that mode? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted January 10, 2020 Super Members Share Posted January 10, 2020 7 minutes ago, mercer said: With the original they were at the mercy of the sensor but with the P4K its a specific crop they created, so one would assume they chose the traditional sensor size... I find this mode very intriguing because it opens up a slew of lens options that could soften the look of the P4K. I don't know if you've seen any footage from the Alexa S16 mode but it's pretty gorgeous. I appreciate the sentiment. Weirdly enough, I haven't found one sample from the new S16 mode online... I would have thought it would be a pretty big deal since a lot of members at bmcuser were petitioning for that mode since the camera was announced. Let me go and dig out the worst lens in the world and put it on my Pocket4K Back in 10 kye and mercer 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 4 minutes ago, BTM_Pix said: Let me go and dig out the worst lens in the world and put it on my Pocket4K Back in 10 Should we expect a Fujian P4K sample shot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted January 10, 2020 Super Members Share Posted January 10, 2020 20 minutes ago, mercer said: Should we expect a Fujian P4K sample shot? Computar 12.5-75mm f1.2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 41 minutes ago, mercer said: With the original they were at the mercy of the sensor but with the P4K its a specific crop they created, so one would assume they chose the traditional S16mm size... maybe @CaptainHook knows? I find this mode very intriguing because it opens up a slew of lens options that could soften the look of the P4K. I don't know if you've seen any footage from the Alexa S16 mode but it's pretty gorgeous. I appreciate the sentiment. Weirdly enough, I haven't found one sample from the new S16 mode online... I would have thought it would be a pretty big deal since a lot of members at bmcuser were petitioning for that mode since the camera was announced. Also, is the S16 crop mode only in BRaw or is it also available for ProRes? And will regular SDXC cards work in that mode? Maybe the resolution will give it away? If it's RAW then we can just work out what percentage of the normal resolution it is and then apply that to the normal crop factor of the P4K? 5 minutes ago, BTM_Pix said: Computar 12.5-75mm f1.2 Oh I don't know... Those new fangled computars are gonna run the world one day boy!! OK, from the BM page, the P4K sensor is 10mm wide, and that is 4096 pixels. I think the new mode is the "2688 x 1512 (2.6K 16:9) up to 120 fps" one (also from P4K specs page), which means that it's using an area of the sensor that is 6.56mm wide. Referring back to this image again: a FF sensor has a width of 24mm, so therefore the crop is 24/6.56 = 3.66 I used the width as that stays constant when you choose different aspect ratios, so it's easier to work out. Did I do that right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 20 minutes ago, kye said: Did I do that right? It may be, but from your calculations, the crop seems too large, but I am not the right person to ask about such things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted January 10, 2020 Super Members Share Posted January 10, 2020 35 minutes ago, mercer said: Should we expect a Fujian P4K sample shot? OK, this is a quick and dirty test so ignore the framing and white balance differences ! So, the Computar 12.5-75mm f1.2 isn't strictly a Super16mm lens but we can use it as a guide to sensor coverage versus the OG BMPCC. This is it at 12.5mm with the Pocket4K in 4K DCI so you can see how much its covering. This is it in the 2.6K 16:9 mode And this is it on the OG BMPCC If you look at the vignetting, you can see that the BMPCC has a fraction more than the Pocket4K so the conclusion is that a lens worked for you on the BMPCC it will be fine on the Pocket4K in the 2.6K 16:9 mode as it appears to have a marginally bigger crop. mercer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 5 minutes ago, BTM_Pix said: If you look at the vignetting, you can see that the BMPCC has a fraction more than the Pocket4K so the conclusion is that a lens worked for you on the BMPCC it will be fine on the Pocket4K in the 2.6K 16:9 mode as it appears to have a marginally bigger crop. Yeah that is a marginal difference, so if I had to guess, a 3x crop (give or take) sounds about right. That shot is in BRaw, right? Did you notice any more noise in the S16 mode? And finally, will SD cards work in that mode or do you need CFast/SSD? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.