kidzrevil Posted June 6, 2018 Share Posted June 6, 2018 On 6/5/2018 at 1:14 AM, dbp said: I believe this is a misconception. Certainly RAW gives you the ability to push colors around more after the fact, but it still seems like there's an innate look to each camera. Otherwise no one would ever bother with an Alexa, given RED's RAW capabilities. Even with massive budgets and top colorists, RED footage is not really hitting the same highs as the Alexa by most people's standards. To answer your question with the 5D, for me it's the color science. The colors are just so damn pleasing with everything I see. I can't really dynamic range, because I don't think it's all that outrageous compared to current offerings. Certainly there are sharper cameras out there. The colors though, I definitely dig em'. Correct. How the cameras sensor reacts to light is its innate look. Each sensor is sensitive to light in different ways. The best part about RAW imo is you can now manipulate the large pallette of colors the cameras sensor can see to your desire. Besides processing on a computer is significantly more powerful than the internal image processing done in any camera so thats another plus to raw. Canon 5D mark iii RAW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmcindie Posted June 6, 2018 Share Posted June 6, 2018 On 6/4/2018 at 5:41 PM, Geoff CB said: The short I shot on the Ursa 4.6K I was shot at 4.6K scope 4:2:2 I wish I had shot in 2K 4:4:4 instead. Especially with a 2K DCP delivery. Color and motion over Resolution every time. You can get 2k 4:4:4 just by downsampling 4k 4:2:2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.