mercer Posted August 28, 2018 Author Share Posted August 28, 2018 I’m still a couple months out before I get one, so just doing research right now. I’ve already changed my mind once or twice just today, so we’ll see what happens. newfoundmass 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcio Kabke Pinheiro Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 5 hours ago, BTM_Pix said: Same f stop on a smaller sensor than the others though so a slightly more generous DOF. Have to take my LX100 out of the box. You use Aperture to process the LX100 raw files, @BTM_Pix? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 2 hours ago, mercer said: Well, the truth of it is, I am most interested in the Panny’s for their IBIS, but the smart play would be the Sigma for stills and my 5D3 for video... Or some kind of cheap and small Canon so I can practice processing Raw stills to benefit both ML Raw video and photography. And then see what the FF Canon mirrorless offers as a hybrid sometime down the line. But yeah the Sigma SD Quattro has some serious IQ. Have you looked at the Flickr page... holy cow... the colors and textures and shadows... why oh why won’t Sigma figure out a way to have video on one of their cameras... they should hire A1ex from Magic Lantern to figure out Raw Video with the Foveon sensor. Well the reason is that the Foveon sensor takes so damn much processing power that is really impossible to have a video stream of all that data. Sigma in a sense has been doing computational computing for years when nobody had even heard about it, and to make the Quattro sensor particularly to get it to work. Heck they can't even really make it do 1fps in Photo Raw Mode with any real dependability, a short 3 fps in JPEG and wait for half a minute, and shoot another short burst LoL. That is why the original Quattro body shape was so weird looking, It is basically a giant heat sink. They are a crazy strange camera, but once you have one you never feel the same about any other camera output wise. They have no Morie' and have micro contrast out the behind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonesy Jones Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 25 minutes ago, webrunner5 said: computational computing Hmmm... I'd like to try photographical photography with one of their cameras. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 6 minutes ago, Jonesy Jones said: Hmmm... I'd like to try photographical photography with one of their cameras. Be nice, it took me 4 minutes to figure out how to spell computational computing, let alone understand it. Plus photographical photography sort of sounds Dirty LoL! ? Jonesy Jones 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Sherman Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 5 hours ago, mercer said: Nice samples BTW, I like the B&W in particular. Do you remember the lens you used? Maybe I can get by with a G85 as a hybrid then... then I’ll have 4K and IBIS. I went back and looked them up this evening, and I'm betting you will be surprised. The cactus like flower was shot with the Panasonic 25mm f/1.7. Its on sale at B&H right now for $150. The Purple flower, red/pink flower, squirrel, and turtle where shot with the Olympus 60mm f/2.8 macro. This is one of my favorite lenses and is als0 on sale at B&H for $349. The train is the one that will probably shock you. It was shot with the G7's kit zoom 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II. It's not even a very good shot, because if you look close you will see the highlights are blown out in some spots in the clouds. I was rushing to get the shot, and get back on the train before it left the station. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 Yeah I took this with my Panny G7 using the 14-45mm kit lens hand held. It is straight OOC.That is the very first kit lens Panasonic ever made and I think they are actually the best one they ever made. For the money a Panny G7 is just too good to pass up. I know it doesn't have IBIS, but for less than 400 bucks at times what is really better. And it does 4K. mercer, TrueIndigo and Dan Sherman 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted August 28, 2018 Super Members Share Posted August 28, 2018 6 hours ago, Márcio Kabke Pinheiro said: Have to take my LX100 out of the box. You use Aperture to process the LX100 raw files, @BTM_Pix? I have done but in this case they were all done in Lightroom for continuity as the DNG from the Sigmas isn't supported in Aperture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Sherman Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 7 hours ago, webrunner5 said: For the money a Panny G7 is just too good to pass up. I know it doesn't have IBIS, but for less than 400 bucks at times what is really better. And it does 4K. It's also super light at 415g compared to the gh5's 725g. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, Dan Sherman said: It's also super light at 415g compared to the gh5's 725g. Wow didn't realize they were that much different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Sherman Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 3 hours ago, webrunner5 said: Wow didn't realize they were that much different. I'm constantly amazed by the size, weight, quality, & applicability of most MFT bodies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgreszcz Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 On 8/28/2018 at 12:23 PM, webrunner5 said: Wow didn't realize they were that much different. After shooting events/weddings all day with the GH5, compared to the GX80 I can really notice the difference in my hand/wrist soreness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IOJKL Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 Hello, first post after few years reading you guys. I have both gh5 and gx80 and use them regularly for video and stills. Gh5 is clearly superior in image quality not just resolution but color rendition, noise, detail, etc. Is an incredible piece of gear and it really feels solid and all the controls are in the right place. But gx80 keeps things smaller, lighter and anybody cares when you get it out, very usefull sometimes, is my everyday cam for pictures. I have quite a few pictures from both cameras in my instagram, maybe not the best platform to see image quality but I can upload any of them to 500px too. Here is the url https://www.instagram.com/carlos_lor/ in case you want to check it. We also have a couple of g80s at the production company I work for, very comfortable camera too, good ergonomics and viewfinder, same image quality as the gx80. webrunner5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danielius Posted September 4, 2018 Share Posted September 4, 2018 With the newest GH5 firmware, V-log can be used in photo shooting. Is there any advantage of using log over other picture profiles? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurtlandPhoto Posted September 4, 2018 Share Posted September 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Danielius said: With the newest GH5 firmware, V-log can be used in photo shooting. Is there any advantage of using log over other picture profiles? Absolutely none. Shoot raw format for an advantage in stills. newfoundmass and Danielius 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.