gethin Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 12 hours ago, IronFilm said: Maybe they're not but they are very smug. Smuuuuuug. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 6 hours ago, wolf33d said: My personal opinion is that buying a R versus a Z is being out of his mind. Want good photo? Get the Nikon with better sensor and as good ergonomics/colors. Want video or both? Well IBIS plus No crop beat canon R anytime. But for me A7S3 / GH5 FF should be better than the Z, at least in video. a shame that Nikon does not release a 4K60P A7SIII equivalent... Well until very recently absolutely nobody but Panasonic offered 4K 60fps (at least not around the $2K ish price point). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeys Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 Late to this, but to answer the topic, I do think it's a lot of Sony fanboys trying to defend their "territory". The Z cameras are competent and with Nikon's ergonomics might be something I get if I have too much money to burn, which is probably never. I get paid work for stills work with a GH3, so ultimately it's about client expectation management, as well as how comfortable you are with working with your tools. IronFilm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.