webrunner5 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 He has a point, only Canon could probably do it that cheap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 12 hours ago, webrunner5 said: Well now he is talking about a Canon 500 Dollar FF camera. Makes some good points but man that seems like a real long shot from Canon or any other company. Sounds like they're in full on troll / click bait / Canon shrill mode. 11 hours ago, webrunner5 said: He has a point, only Canon could probably do it that cheap. Well as one of the youtube commentators said.... "They have already build a 500$ mirrorless full frame camera. And then they overpriced it to 1300$, because that's what they do." Castorp, Kisaha, thebrothersthre3 and 1 other 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dude_ger Posted March 2, 2019 Share Posted March 2, 2019 Aren t you the guy who sells expensive luts (everybody can make on their own within 5 minutes) to amateurs? or the guy who stole everything from Magiclantern, packed it into a "raw shooters guide" and sold it expensive? Hahaha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cogmission Posted March 3, 2019 Share Posted March 3, 2019 Hi Andrew, I'm not sure when this trend started, but companies are not plural. It is "Panasonic has", not "Panasonic have". It makes me cringe observing the increasing number of people latching on to this mistake. Companies are a grammatical singular entity even though they refer semantically to an aggregation. (Semantics refer to the meaning of a thing). That aside, Tony's article bugged me too but after watching it several times, I realized he prefaced his negative comments with explanations of why he reached the opinion he did, and he was very careful to qualify all of his negative comments. Still, it bugged me that he posted a "commissioned" link to profit from any S1/S1R purchases - even though he says the camera is not yet a wise consumer purchase. IronFilm and Alt Shoo 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webrunner5 Posted March 4, 2019 Share Posted March 4, 2019 Hmm LoL. Re thinking my comment. The more I think about it the more I need to think LoL. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSMW Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 The man seems to be on something of a mission at the moment to sow the seeds of the destruction of his YouTube channel and therefore business. (Afghan Girl saga). Muppetry. PrometheusDM and Orangenz 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweak Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 37 minutes ago, MrSMW said: The man seems to be on something of a mission at the moment to sow the seeds of the destruction of his YouTube channel and therefore business. (Afghan Girl saga). Muppetry. Do elaborate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSMW Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Google it! It's all over YouTube etc. I'm not particularly interested in slating the guy, but he brings so much on his own head. Ah well, he will probably have to take up being a photographer after all and start shooting weddings... Orangenz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topcat Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 I think its bad idea for anyone, especially a professional reviewer to dismiss a camera that they haven't spent time with. That said for me with the X-T3 the EOS RP seems like a good way to get into FF. I already have some Canon FF lenses to try with my X-T3 and Viltrox speedbooster so would just need the body and adapter. Also while it does crop 4k the 1.6x factor is a perfect match for an EF-S lens. Where can I get equivalent lenses for the S1 crop? The S1R seems to do everything but for the price with kit lens I can have the X-T3 with gimbal, a zoom, couple of primes AND a speedbooster plus a Canon zoom and primes while I wait out the mirrorless FF wars. PrometheusDM 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusDM Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 He doesn't have the camera to test it. Here is a review from someone who has it since 4/4. The Panasonic S1 REVIEW. Darn NEAR PERFECT Digital Camera Here is from someone who used it more than 3 months. Video shooting with Panasonic S1: Long Term Real World Review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95sH-HDHN4M He lack any credibility when he doesn't even have the S1 to try it for long term. webrunner5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amazeballs Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Browsing through this topic I was surprised to find out that Sony Imx272 sensor used in GH5 is capable of 110fps 4K 10 bit, and even 6K 84 fps 10 bit gush we need a magic lantern for our beloved GH5! I would be vert happy with a 96fps 4k 8bit 5 min recording capability with AF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Maaaaaaaaybe the processor in the GH5 can't handle anything higher? Look at how there is an identical sensor in the Terra 4K / GH5S / BMPCC4K / E2, yet they each get something a bit different out of the sensor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.