roccoforte Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 A lot of the video I've seen shot with this lens looks soft. I don't know if this is user error or if this lens is generally soft. What's its reputation? How does it compare to the Iscorama 36 and 54? And the Bolex Moller? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dahlfors Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 One of the regulars at the forum shot a nice comparison a while ago: http://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/2170-iscorama-vs-iscomorphot-8-2x-vs-iscomorphot-8-15x/ roccoforte 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Honestly, that test is a poor example of this optic's potential It's very very soft at large apertures, but I personally think it looks great once stopped down to around 5.6 However, the price inflation is out of hand I don't think it's ever worth more than $600, let alone $2k Here's some stuff I shot with it on the Helios 44-2 (I use the Nikkor 50 1.8 AI now, even sharper) http://www.flickr.com/photos/benwabbott/9777957383/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/benwabbott/9777675601/ roccoforte 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roccoforte Posted September 17, 2013 Author Share Posted September 17, 2013 Ben - great looking stills. Thanks for the feedback. Its certainly a great looking lens and I've been craving a single focus system after a shoot with my Bolex Moller (which I love). I don't know if the sacrifice is worth it. Wish I could try one out too, but maan, this community is tiny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuickHitRecord Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Honestly, that test is a poor example of this optic's potential It's very very soft at large apertures, but I personally think it looks great once stopped down to around 5.6 Why is it a poor example? I think that it reinforces what you said about the lens being usable at f5.6 and smaller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Why is it a poor example? I think that it reinforces what you said about the lens being usable at f5.6 and smaller. Because in your test it's never really sharp at all, 5.6 and 8 still look fluffy, in my opinion, compared to most other footage I've seen with this adapter. I never thought for a moment it was you, though, I think it was the taking lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuickHitRecord Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Everything was focused carefully. If you own a sharper copy of this lens than the one that I had, consider yourself fortunate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Everything was focused carefully. If you own a sharper copy of this lens than the one that I had, consider yourself fortunate. I figured you focused perfectly, that wasn't my problem, I feel the Nikon 50 ais isn't as good a fit as the older ai or a helios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuickHitRecord Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Personally, I prefer the Nikkor 50mm AI-S to the Helios-44 for pairing with anamorphic lenses, but it's purely subjective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Somehow or other that was a very nice comparison. Much more entertaining to see a sympathique smiling face :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now