Sean Cunningham Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Far be it from me to stand in the way of wasted cycles. I mean, if it makes sense to your aunt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wgtwo Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Yeah, the image circle is probably big enough. I've put a Sigma 18-35mm on a 5D2... 18mm is tunnel vision, but at 35mm it almost covers fullframe. I take it you don't have a M4/3 camera and speed booster? What I'd like to see is samples, and to get an indication of what the widest usable focal length would be. EDIT: I did some math, using a full frame 18mm still, and technically, coverage should be fine for GH3 video. However, based on the same test, the GH2's 16:9 should be fine too, so I'm not really sure what to believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chastepe Posted November 5, 2013 Share Posted November 5, 2013 Hi, Could you please provide links (amazon.uk etc) of the Lens and Speedbooster you used? I loved the image quality and I am planning to buy a BMPCC in the near future but I am also convinced the accessories you used would make a great fit for the camera. Thanks a lot :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernesto Mantaras Posted November 5, 2013 Share Posted November 5, 2013 Has anyone been able to try the 18-35mm with a Speed Booster on a GH2 and GH3, to know to what extent it can be used in them? I'm considering to buy this combination (as soon as the Speed Booster comes back in stock). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbsy Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Hi Andrew, thanks heaps for the review and video. Very thorough and informative! I also enjoyed your accompanying video. You mentioned that the lens has a longish focus travel. So would you say it is definitely not an issue for pulling focus. This is the only thing putting me off purchasing this lens for my BMPCC and opting for modified Fujinon 12.5 and 25. Obviously the zoom is preferable. What are your thoughts? Cheers again man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c131frdave Posted November 19, 2013 Share Posted November 19, 2013 Hi Andrew. Great footage, some of the best I've seen. Maybe I missed it in your description. I was under the impression that the Sigma lens needed to be powered in order to open the iris and iris control. I didn't see an independently powered adapter for the lens. Does the power come from the camera, through the metabones speed booster? Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed_lee83 Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Another dumb question if I may... when using this lens on a speed booster or whatever, how does one change the iris?? I presume it doesn't have a mechanical aperture ring? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axel Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Sigma is parfocal based on reports online, at the blackmagic forums and elsewhere. There is contradicting "evidence" on the net. This video shows that it's parfocal: This video shows that it isn't: Well, mine isn't. If you zoom in, focus, and then zoom out, the focus has changed slightly. Subtly. Barely noticeable. But it is not parfocal. The zoom ring is porno. Very soft, yet very strong resistance. Easy to ease-in-ease-out. Harder if you want to zoom fast. There is another peculiar effect with the SB: The backfocus changed. ∞ is not ∞, but a little closer. Perhaps this is normal: There is a mark on the focus ring before ∞, and that's it. Strange. What many will not expect is the degree to which the SB in combination with this lens amplifies, er, light. In daytime, the zebra flashes indoors, and you obviously can't close the Sigmas aperture enough with the SBs 1-7 stops. So I will need an ND solution, even if I don't look for shallow DoF, but just for the extended FOV. I talked to a photographer, and he said he'd prefer good fixed filters over an ND fader, for quality reasons. You could change them fast with a magnetic adapter like this. Cost more, all in all, than a Genus Eclipse or Tiffen VariND. But better than a mattebox with filter trays. Because to get the same quality, you'd need to spent a fortune. You'd have to rent them. Never think that Pocket implies pocket money ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Gentles Posted December 27, 2013 Share Posted December 27, 2013 So to jump in now means buying the nikon mount Sigma 18 -35mm and the Nikon BMPCC Speedbooster? Is it worth waiting for an EF Speedbooster for ppl like me who have mainly Canon lenses? I would love an EF 18 -35mm....yeah baby!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyDulac Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 http://vimeo.com/76881206 I would really love to see how tlens does against a $47,000 + tax cinema lens like the Optimo 15-40mm T2.6 because I honestly think it would come close. Blackmagic must share a similar philosophy, because the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera gives an image that in many ways exceeds the $15,000 Canon C300 especially when paired with the Metabones Speed Booster.Read the full article here Andrew, do you use any type IR filters with the sigma and bmpcc combo? I just picked up a Tiffen IRND 1.8 to start my kit, but was curious what you use? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.