mtheory Posted October 15, 2013 Share Posted October 15, 2013 I haven't gotten a chance to see BMCC's imagery in cinemas or at film festivals over a length of a full feature film, - tests, music videos and shorts don't give me the real "feel" for what this camera can do. Does anyone know of any theatrical feature films that were shot on BMCC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgharding Posted October 15, 2013 Share Posted October 15, 2013 I've not found any yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
austinmcconnell Posted October 15, 2013 Share Posted October 15, 2013 The cam probably hasn't been out in the wild long enough. On average a film will take 2 years to complete. Assuming most folks are just NOW starting to get their hands on it, it might take a while. Also, factor in a steep learning curve, a lack of filmmakers being enthused about some of the BMCC's shortcomings when it comes to workflow, and it might be some time before we see an actual feature shot on it. And if we do, it will most likely be from a lower-budget indie. Thus, chances of actually viewing it in a cinema are rather small. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axel Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 ... and it might be some time before we see an actual feature shot on it. And if we do, it will most likely be from a lower-budget indie. Thus, chances of actually viewing it in a cinema are rather small. I really hope there will be a new wave of influental independant films that deserve this name. Even worse than being dependant on the politics of major production companies is the situation in my country. It has the "FFA", an acronym for film promotion association, founded in 1968, and it effectively finances german theatrical films with tax money, but approving the standards, which can only be described as uncinematic and boring. It's a federal association that decides if scripts are worth the investment, and you can easily imagine what that means for creativity and originality. I particularly hope, that indie filmmakers will stop to think retro. If they want to reinvent cinema, there is no frigging 'cinematic look' to be followed, no grain filters, no exaggerated DoF-gimmicks, no oange-teal-'blockbuster'-grading, that would be embarrassing. There has to be a good and revolutionary story that dictates it's own aestethics, preferably clean and straight. Don't dream about fancy imagery, you've got a camera with sufficient color depth to look good on a big screen. Now it's time to tell something! HurtinMinorKey, mtheory, andy lee and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefydiscovery Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 for me the cameras are red epic and arri alexa for films stop..but for camera b are gh2/3 ,5d mark and d5200. sorry my english.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soupkitchen Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 If you are shooting in tungsten light the BMCC is a better choice than an Epic. The noise that REDs all have displayed under tungsten drops the resolution right down. I've just shot a high budget music video with Epics and a tiny budget one with a BMCC. Guess which needed more denoise-ing in post... For B and C cams I think you'd find the BMCC a better choice than the others, specially the pocket, as they have tried to match their colour science to Arri's pretty closely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.