Anaconda_ Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 I think it's hard to find a 'bad' camera in any price point with so many amazing products at great value coming out. But that got me thinking, what gives the least value for money in any given price bracket? Let's say 500 - 1000 1000 - 1500 1500 - 2000 2000 - 2500 2500 - 3000 And so on if you want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisaha Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 Put a Canon on every bracket and you will hit 4/5 for sure! ntblowz, EthanAlexander, heart0less and 5 others 1 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Garcia Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kisaha said: Put a Canon on every bracket and you will hit 4/5 for sure! LOL HIlarious! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newfoundmass Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 I mean it's easy to crap on Canon but it's true. I'd have to say they'd take up most of the list. I'd also put the Panasonic G95 on there, as though it's a great camera it's a marginal upgrade over the G85 and you can get the G85 for so little now that there's not a lot of reasons to get the G95. Probably not a worse value than any of the Canons in that price range, but it was a disappointing release and I've heard almost nothing about it since release, which isn't a good sign given how popular the G85 ended up being. MurtlandPhoto 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 The best thing about the G95 is that it stopped the G85 being a current model, I am looking forward to the ebay price drops. MurtlandPhoto 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 Buying the mot expensive camera in the price bracket and then trying to buy the rest of your kit with the change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barefoot_dp Posted September 15, 2019 Share Posted September 15, 2019 I'm sure I'll cop flak for this, but pretty much every Leica camera would win this in their respective price categories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amazeballs Posted September 15, 2019 Share Posted September 15, 2019 Agree about G95 and Canon. I would also add Olympus Em1X and Sony A6600. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted September 15, 2019 Share Posted September 15, 2019 On 9/15/2019 at 8:56 AM, kye said: Buying the mot expensive camera in the price bracket and then trying to buy the rest of your kit with the change. And yet I see this pattern repeated over and over and over again! Almost as common as people buying Canons. kye 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboRat Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 On 9/15/2019 at 3:26 AM, newfoundmass said: I mean it's easy to crap on Canon but it's true. I'd have to say they'd take up most of the list. I'd also put the Panasonic G95 on there, as though it's a great camera it's a marginal upgrade over the G85 and you can get the G85 for so little now that there's not a lot of reasons to get the G95. Probably not a worse value than any of the Canons in that price range, but it was a disappointing release and I've heard almost nothing about it since release, which isn't a good sign given how popular the G85 ended up being. Agree here. Reviews for the G95 aren't great since the G85 is still a good buy 14 hours ago, Amazeballs said: Agree about G95 and Canon. I would also add Olympus Em1X and Sony A6600. Same for the A6400? For lenses, I think the PanaLeica 12mm f1.4. I can't see why a wide angle lens should be so expensive, and you won't use it a 1.4 that much. Panasonic 10-25mm f1.7, I want to say is also not worth the price tag, just because I can't afford it. For lights - Digital Sputnik voyager - expensive RGB lights that dont output much power Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokara Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 On 9/14/2019 at 11:13 AM, Anaconda_ said: I think it's hard to find a 'bad' camera in any price point with so many amazing products at great value coming out. But that got me thinking, what gives the least value for money in any given price bracket? Let's say 500 - 1000 1000 - 1500 1500 - 2000 2000 - 2500 2500 - 3000 And so on if you want. Anything with the word "Leica" in its name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaylee Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 under $500 has gotta be potato ive gotten good results from them before, but if you have the budget i would NOT recommend using one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrothersthre3 Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 1 hour ago, kaylee said: under $500 has gotta be potato ive gotten good results from them before, but if you have the budget i would NOT recommend using one I don't know you can get some pretty damn good M43 cameras under $500 that do 4k with IBIS kaylee 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboRat Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 3 hours ago, kaylee said: under $500 has gotta be potato ive gotten good results from them before, but if you have the budget i would NOT recommend using one Got a used G80 for 500usd and the OG BMPCC is under 500usd nowadays so no kaylee 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 3 hours ago, thebrothersthre3 said: I don't know you can get some pretty damn good M43 cameras under $500 that do 4k with IBIS They wouldn't be the "LEAST bang for you buck" kaylee 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSMW Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 Least bang for your buck has to be Leica. That red dot adds a lot to the price for cameras that are typically a lower spec than some others much cheaper. Doesn't stop me wanting a Leica however! Canon otherwise, especially the EOS R. Was a potential contender for me, both stills and video. It's neither and very disappointing spec wise. OK, not actually tried it, but on paper it doesn't meet my needs (far from it). The enormous lump of Olympus EM1XXXXXXXXL or whatever it's called. If a camera has to be that big, I'm going to want a big sensor... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newfoundmass Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 12 hours ago, TurboRat said: Agree here. Reviews for the G95 aren't great since the G85 is still a good buy Not to mention for a little more you can get the GH5! 8 hours ago, kaylee said: under $500 has gotta be potato ive gotten good results from them before, but if you have the budget i would NOT recommend using one You can get a Panasonic G7 for under $500 now. It arguably has a better image than the GH4! There are quite a few Panny cameras under the $500 range at this point that are excellent value! I'm trying really hard not to get one, because I don't need one, but that's how good a value those are! ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaylee Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 i maintain that potato is the least bang for your cinematic buck EthanAlexander 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leslie Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 14 minutes ago, kaylee said: i maintain that potato is the least bang for your cinematic buck on the upside you can at least boil and eat a potato. While lots of cameras do get roasted on the forum from time to time i have yet to hear of someone actually eating one ? kaylee 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted September 16, 2019 Super Members Share Posted September 16, 2019 1 hour ago, kaylee said: i maintain that potato is the least bang for your cinematic buck Unless its a RED One. kaylee and gethin 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.