Video Hummus Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 8 minutes ago, hoodlum said: Does that mean the GH5 will have an integrated battery grip as well? 😮 Why not! And the GX10 as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stathman Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 I hope it's the same source that told you about 6K 60p and anamorphic modes on X-T4! 😛 keessie65, heart0less and Andrew Reid 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted February 21, 2020 Author Administrators Share Posted February 21, 2020 23 minutes ago, Amazeballs said: Same here. X-H2 with integrated grip will be a no-buy for me. Too bulky. There is just no point of sticking to APC-S for such a bulky camera for me. They have to distinguish it from thin, light X-T4! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chadandreo Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 I’d much rather have an add-on battery grip, this way I can choose which setup I want to use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted February 21, 2020 Author Administrators Share Posted February 21, 2020 Agree, but sometimes peak current draw is too much for one battery, I believe... Especially if you have powerful spec like 8K going on JR Lipartito and Juank 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Hill Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 4 hours ago, hoodlum said: Does that mean the GH5 will have an integrated battery grip as well? 😮 No, but the GH6 might 😁 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrothersthre3 Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 If its a cheap 8k camera with fuji color, ibis, and amazing auto focus I don't care how big it is. Sure Canon is releasing smaller mirrorless 8k cameras but I am sure they will cost a mint. Plus fuji lenses are tiny making the whole package lighter regardless. Juank 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Video Hummus Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 Maybe they need the integrated battery grip because of voltage requirements and heat pipes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chadandreo Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 5 hours ago, Andrew Reid said: Agree, but sometimes peak current draw is too much for one battery, I believe... Especially if you have powerful spec like 8K going on Makes sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrothersthre3 Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 I mean if it can give the camera 3 hours of life than I'd be a happy camper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wafa Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 On 2/21/2020 at 8:47 AM, androidlad said: Just received info from a source that, X-H2 (or whatever the next gen rugged flagship is called) will have integrated battery grip, like this: Can you confirm it will in fact be this 43 mp sensor (or any other information on this camera)? Fuji Boss said their lenses only resolve up to 32mp, which would seem difficult to release many mark ii lenses at once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 No one needs glass will resolve more pixels to take advantage from them, being image acquisition a combo, got it? : -) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
androidlad Posted June 7, 2020 Share Posted June 7, 2020 According to a source, X-H2 is likely to have a conventional Bayer CFA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted June 7, 2020 Author Administrators Share Posted June 7, 2020 I think the X-H1 had conventional Bayer CFA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainbowmerlin Posted June 7, 2020 Share Posted June 7, 2020 2 hours ago, Andrew Reid said: I think the X-H1 had conventional Bayer CFA? No, it was X-Trans (see specs on link below): https://***URL removed***/reviews/fujifilm-x-h1 Though I wonder if one argument for moving to Bayer CFA for X-H2 might be all the software work Fujifilm have done on the image processing on the GFX cameras, which use Bayer? Perhaps they can transfer some of that work over to a Bayer X-H2? Geoff CB 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Video Hummus Posted June 7, 2020 Share Posted June 7, 2020 What are the practical limitations to X-Trans? More processing requirements for video? XT-4 already pushes out beefy video specs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted June 7, 2020 Author Administrators Share Posted June 7, 2020 I am wondering what the practical benefits are to the image with X-Trans too. Image detail closer to Foveon? Or is it better just to put more megapixels in a conventional Bayer CFA? And when it comes to video I expect X-Trans offers zero benefit, which might be why it won't be in the X-H2. I do like the filmic noise grain of X-Trans RAW files though, but you have to be REALLY pixel peeping to notice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Video Hummus Posted June 8, 2020 Share Posted June 8, 2020 Wikipedia says Fuji claims X-Trans layout eliminates the need for an optical low-pass filter thus enhancing resolution at the cost of processing requirements. So, considering what they do with XT-4, I’m not sure. Maybe someone with more knowledge can shed some light on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now