Jump to content

Transcoding ProRes or other with M1? Better results than h.265?


filmmakereu
 Share

Recommended Posts

EOSHD Pro Color 5 for Sony cameras EOSHD Z LOG for Nikon CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

Everyone wants to talk about 4K and 6K and 8K and 12K, and to talk about 8-bit vs 10-bit vs 12-bit vs 14-bit, but when it actually comes to the quality of the image, people don't want to know.

I was interested in it but found so little online that I ended up having to do my own study on the SNR of various codecs myself.  It's here:

You're talking about the quality / performance of the same flavours of codec but with differing encoding methods (software/hardware).  I'd bet you won't find anything and you'll have to do your own testing to find answers.  

I found it almost impossible to get information on the T2 chip that even specified if it was supported, and if so, what codecs / bit-depths / subsampling it supported.

Good luck, but my advice is to give up asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2020 at 4:50 PM, filmmakereu said:

There are reports the fast h.265 handling is faster but lower quality comparing with the Intel capabilities.

Will ProRes or other have the same issues?

I also had asked it there but no answers so far:

 

I also wonder if h.265 transcoding / encoding with software isn't possible to overcome those issues of M1 hardware?

Where are you seeing the news of poor encoding?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • EOSHD Pro Color 5 for All Sony cameras
    EOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
    EOSHD Dynamic Range Enhancer for H.264/H.265
×
×
  • Create New...