abds69 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 APS-C vs 4/3. 4/3 format is a bastard talking about cinema standard. Between Super 16mm and 35mm. Less cinematic image and not video image too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utsira Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 APS-C vs 4/3. 4/3 format is a bastard talking about cinema standard. Between Super 16mm and 35mm. Less cinematic image and not video image too. Nothing wrong with being a bastard. We should embrace its bastard-ness! Besides, there were all sorts of film gauges besides 16 and 35, 17.5, 18, 21 etc IronFilm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inazuma Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 APS-C vs 4/3. 4/3 format is a bastard talking about cinema standard. Between Super 16mm and 35mm. Less cinematic image and not video image too. Whilst i do love a good bokehlicious image, I think for the most part it is overused/rated as a cinematic tool. Shows like Breaking Bad and The Walking Dead are shot on 35mm film, but often use deep focus. Their image is very atmospheric. Quentin Trrantino is another director who mostly uses deep focus. And if i remember correctly, Reservoir dogs was shot on 16mm. Then you have shows like Game Of Thrones that uses the Super 35 Arri Alexa. They often use shallow DOF, but to their detriment IMO. Because all the effort they put into making the fantastic sets becomes blurred out in every dialogue shot. Also I sometimes find shallow DOF to make the image look fake - as if the actors have been green screened in to the scene. Aussie Ash 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmcindie Posted June 13, 2014 Share Posted June 13, 2014 Whilst i do love a good bokehlicious image, I think for the most part it is overused/rated as a cinematic tool. Shows like Breaking Bad and The Walking Dead are shot on 35mm film, Then you have shows like Game Of Thrones that uses the Super 35 Arri Alexa. They often use shallow DOF, but to their detriment IMO. Because all the effort they put into making the fantastic sets becomes blurred out in every dialogue shot. Also I sometimes find shallow DOF to make the image look fake - as if the actors have been green screened in to the scene. I disagree. Walking Dead is 16mm btw. Game of Thrones is about drama and it looks great. Though I think it would look even better with a bit more grain and lower amount of studio lights. Nothing looks weirder than people sitting besides a fire that is obviously lit up by a megaton of light from elsewhere. Game of Thrones doesn't even use that much shallow DOF. Does this shot look shallow? '> Or how about this one? '> I don't get this place and it's love for deep DOF. I effing hate deep DOF but that's because I grew up with 1/3" cameras. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inazuma Posted June 13, 2014 Share Posted June 13, 2014 First of all, I never said I loved deep dof. I also grew up with 1/3" cameras and was ecstatic when I finally got a DSLR with a 30mm f1.4 lens. However my tastes have matured since then and I can see the uses of both deep and shallow DOF. That first picture you showed me is a stupid example. You can't get shallow dof on an infinity focused shot :rolleyes: The second picture is a better example, but they obviously wanted to get The Hound's burnt face in the shot to show off in that first episode. If you look at any other scene where there's one or two people speaking, 90% of the time the background will be very out of focus. It's not a bad thing. It's just that it hides all the interesting things and details going on in the scene. It's really my nostalgia for LOTR that's talking. Because they don't use shallow DOF much for that either. And you get to see a lot more of the scenery (and thus the culture of the location, whether it be Gondor or Mordor), which adds to the immersion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunyata Posted June 13, 2014 Share Posted June 13, 2014 ha.. "i don't get this place". as if there was any consensus on this forum. Inazuma and Nick Hughes 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abds69 Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 Hello, just to tell you. Received VILTROX adapter EF-NEX II (FF version for A7 also). Everything fine with it. In video mode, IS and Aperture functional. AF continuous mode not available, have to buy sony lenses i suppose. AF ok in photo mode, IS too. Concerning machined rings, it's a perfect fit Only a slight play for a6000 and canon lenses at the other side. I remembered Yongnuo adapter where everything moves when adapter and lens were clipped, tolerances not respected, i never saw that !! around 95€ tested with Sigma EF 18-50/f2.8, canon 50f1.8, canon 55-250mm, tamron 18-270VC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toxotis70 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 any link for the adapter ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abds69 Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 http://www.ebay.fr/itm/Viltrox-Objektivadapter-f-Canon-EF-EF-S-EOS-an-Sony-NEX-E-Mount-Kamera-/271463157867?pt=DE_Foto_Camcorder_Objetivanschlüsse_Adapter&hash=item3f3477106b Version 2 compatible A7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pascal Garnier Posted June 20, 2014 Share Posted June 20, 2014 I'm selling my brand new Viltrox adapter, version 2. Works perfect, but I received it as a gift while I'm switching to manual FD lenses ... I only have 2 Canon EF(S) lenses left that I hardly use. Has only been tested today for 10 minutes to make sure it works. Will sell for 70EUR (shipping from Belgium). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolen Cheung Posted June 21, 2014 Share Posted June 21, 2014 A quick question. Does it have a 30 minutes limit in the US version? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xenogears Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 A quick question. Does it have a 30 minutes limit in the US version? Thanks. A fast answer, yes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abds69 Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 Ok first little concert with the a6000. choose hd button to play(only 720P compressed), mind that i use fcpx stab(zoom degradation) , some grading, iso auto till 3200, speed mode 1/50, zoom canon 55-250mm with viltrox, but i love the light, i love the definition... http://www.intimepop.com/2014/06/28/christine-and-the-queens-showcase-fnac-bellecour-lyon-juin-2014/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abds69 Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 fcpx 10.1.2 seems to undertstand now correctly the wide gamut mts from sony a6000 Final Cut Pro X version 10.1.2 Final Cut Pro X version 10.1.2 adds these features. .... Apply a standard (Rec. 709) look in real time to high dynamic range and wide color gamut video from ARRI, Blackmagic Design, Canon, and Sony cameras ...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abds69 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 Sony I LOVE YOU !!!! http://www.intimepop.com/UPLOADSDONTDELETE/2014/midlake1-hd.mp4 sony a6000 + sony 16-50mm portrait -3 -1 +1 DRO off 1/50 Auto ISO <3200 exposure Locked , graded with mlooks in FCPX By the way if you love good music come to my blog intimepop.com Recording at this show, it was pretty hot inside mind you, the sensor after 2 songs overheated and shut down the a6000. I was shooting manual Focus, keeping my hand all the time on the 16-50 mm to focus, no harm except that the sony cam seems to use the LENS BODY as a cooler...to be confirmed but setting on AF , and avoiding touching the lens, i was able to finish the show. Don't know if it was The bionz or the sensor which overheated, but this baby is leaving on edge (size, power, processor...) maxotics 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amro Othman Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 Awesome song and nice video of it, enjoyed watching that :) abds69 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inazuma Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 Is this some sort of joke? It looks like Sony Betamax.. not Sony Alpha! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amro Othman Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 [Double post] - don't know how to delete! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amro Othman Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 Ungraded video frame from a6000 today: Light grade: Medium grade: Guy who graded these in 3 minutes is here: http://www.mkgraphy.net Lens is a Samyang 85mm T1.5. Very happy with the result- looks like a decent still image :) Kwstas Poulios and Inazuma 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EyeSoul Posted July 4, 2014 Share Posted July 4, 2014 Not my video but some of the best A6000 footage I have seen yet. I'm convinced they left XAVC S codec out of this camera purposely "just my theory". It would have been too much camera for the asking price. Very organic image, I did spot moire on one of the guys shirt but hell the images still look quite good. pablogrollan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.