Administrators Andrew Reid Posted April 6, 2014 Administrators Share Posted April 6, 2014 As we get closer to the press conference, more unconfirmed rumours on the A7S have come in from NAB.Read the full article here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jurgen Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Please be $1999, please be $1999 ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Kotlos Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 If it has the same slow rolling shutter as ax100, it will be useless for anything with motion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikkor Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Please 1399€ ^^', I wish it had IBIS but I guess that's too much to ask.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Your source is wrong on the ISO 80.000... price won't be announced. Mark my words ;) etidona 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzynormal Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Grey/Silver suit guy needs a tailor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikkor Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 IP TV seems to suck :rolleyes: fuzzynormal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon Zernich Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Probably get more out of YouTube reviews/tutorials than this streaming: this has less to do with consumers than it does with corporate customers; that said, thanks for the streaming. 5 minutes given to A7S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzynormal Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Club music! Let's dance! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzynormal Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 ISO 50 is nice for video. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikkor Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Oh comon, only external 4K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thementalist Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Is it over? When he said 4k via external recorder only? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikkor Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tungah Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 We all knew there was gonna be a catch. Panasonic can offer 4k internal recording for US$1700. Sony can't, or doesn't want to. Oh well... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thementalist Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Iso sensivity in movie mode: 200-102400. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzynormal Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Hey Sony. You're sweet and all. I just think we're in different places right now. I know you'll meet someone that'll love you for who you are, (*cough* high maintenance *cough*) but I need a more down to earth camera to hang out with and accepts me for who am am and what I want. I just need simple and easy 4K, you know? Don't worry though, lots of fish in the sea. Call me again sometime. Musty 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Ning Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 No slow motion in FullHD higher than 96fps and no internal 4K. Panasonic wins the first round. Cheers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuS Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Low light performance and wider dr is more important to me than in-camera 4k, as the end image is still going to 1080p for me for the forseeable future, and the Atomos makes 4k an option as well. Shame this couldn't have been included in Andrew's recent low light shootout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcs Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 The A7S example 4K video looked, really, really good. Perhaps it's helped by the full frame look and nice bokeh. I saw some noise on the drum in the temple, however the skintones and overall image quality looked better to me than the GH4 examples posted so far. The A7S material looks a lot like 5D3 RAW, with much cleaner, higher resolution! Regarding 8-bit vs. 10-bit and real dynamic range: in my tests with 14-bit 5D3 raw vs. the 8-bit FS700, the FS700's ~14-stop sensor works better in high DR shots vs. the ~11-12 stop 5D3. A question is how does the internal 1080p look in the A7S vs. GH4 4k => 1080p in post. For folks who have Canon EF lenses, all that's needed is a high quality (Metabones etc.) EF to E-mount adapter to get full frame. A Speedbooster gets the GH4 to S35 (full frame not possible). The 720p 120fps S35 crop on the A7S could be full frame with a Speedbooster. A very interesting race between these two cameras: at the gate: GH4 4K resolution with internal recording Higher bitrates Higher resolution slomo 10-bit 422 external 4K A7S Color and image processing Low light performance Full frame DR especially with SLog2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thementalist Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Well, cold mind this morning, and we've to admit that "4k output" is the devil's solution to get from the consumer as much as they can, because the future says 4k will be internal the camera. So does not make much sense to take it, especially because next year will be there, with its 4k. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.