Guest Ebrahim Saadawi Posted June 29, 2014 Share Posted June 29, 2014 Unfortunately as of right now it seems the global shutter circuitry just compromises the sensor's performance too much. I think a compromise-free global shutter is at least five years out. Yes global shutter hardware impairs the sensor's ability to collect light. We see this on the Blackmagic 4K camera where it tops at 400 ISO. I would gladly take rolling shutter for higher ISOs than 400. I can imagine when the low-light performance gets to ridiculous levels we will be able to have global shutters and still good enough ISO performance. Maybe another route in the future would be having extremely fast read-out speeds which 'nearly' eliminates rolling shutter, Camera manufactures will have to find new trends to still be able to sell cameras anyway so I am sure eliminating rolling shutter will be a future trend. Soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Husah Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 F55 has global shutter, too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmcindie Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 Though if you shoot 60p it will most likely start skipping those lines a bit and hence get much faster rolling shutter like the NEX-7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rungunshoot Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 New "test footage" shot in a hot and dry environment... Here's my grade of the Arizona Falls footage (thanks to W. Ashley Maddox). Tried to make it saturated to see how the color holds up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quirky Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 A7S is stills.... don't think they would have the 'S' in the name if it had global shutter. :P So... until A7g is out, then. ;) It's just an engineering challenge I believe. There would actually be significant stills advantages too- faster flash sync, silent shooting all the time, and I'm sure camera makers would love to forego the expense of a mechanical shutter mechanism. Yup, that seems to be the obvious route along which digital cameras are evolving. First to go is the flipping mirror, which has sort of happened already. Next to go, the mechanical shutter. But before that can happen, there needs to be a reliable global shutter that is not too big a compromise. Then, when that happens, or maybe even before, the global shutter will be standard in most larger sensor video cameras, too. Maybe five years is indeed what it takes. Meanwhile, too bad other companies haven't tried the D16 route with today's tools. That is, taking a CCD sensor and trying to work with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wulf Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 Here's my grade of the Arizona Falls footage (thanks to W. Ashley Maddox). Tried to make it saturated to see how the color holds up. while the pastel colours would not really represent my favoured look :-) , you (and the cam) did both a great job in my eyes. Allthough not just on a level like a canikon still shot, it's more than acceptable from a dedicated lowlight body. thy for sharing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apefos Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 There is something I have seen for a long time, since the Technicolor Cinestyle Canon DSLR footage on Vimeo, and now this same thing shows up in Sony S-Log2 footage. When people do the grading in computer, most of times the highlights are not preserved, also the shadows goes too much deep... It seems to be very difficult to grade the flat image, to recover the correct gamma and contrast, and keep the shadows and highlights without crush/clip. If you take a look at these links and compare before/after grading you will perceive that the highlights could be more preserved in the graded images. So, why shoot Cinestyle in Canon or S-Log in Sony if you cannot do a perfect grading in post to preserve all dynamic range? Is this a matter of grading skill? Or it is just impossible to preserve all the dynamic range in highlights and shadows after grading? See: http://www.hingsberg.com/index.php/2013/03/f55-slog2-s-gamut-mode-test/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rungunshoot Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 while the pastel colours would not really represent my favoured look :-) , you (and the cam) did both a great job in my eyes. Allthough not just on a level like a canikon still shot, it's more than acceptable from a dedicated lowlight body. thy for sharing Yeah, it was really hard to keep the colors from posterizing. Maybe there's a trick to keeping stuff natural looking when re-saturating 8-bit log footage... Of course, the easy way out is to keep the log look to the footage, maybe tinting it overall warm or teal, but I think that trend is getting a little stale. And it works best for bleak subject matter...I think most brides would shoot their wedding videographer if they received an ultraflat grade as the final product. So the sweet spot with the A7s is probably a mixture of picture styles and S-Log, depending on subject matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgharding Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 There's a lot of tech that falls by the way-side with mass production, it's sad. I like Sigma's DP Merril series Foveon stacked RBG sensor and leaf shutter compacts, they have detail and look that's unique, very medium format. But ever their new sensor is a compromise... it seems Bayer is here to stay... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quirky Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 There's a lot of tech that falls by the way-side with mass production, it's sad. I like Sigma's DP Merril series Foveon stacked RBG sensor and leaf shutter compacts, they have detail and look that's unique, very medium format. But ever their new sensor is a compromise... it seems Bayer is here to stay... Yes, unfortunately. I love the Foveon look, too. As well as leaf shutters. Even if it means sticking to low ISOs and slower maximum shutter speeds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgharding Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 Here's a domestic test, rolling shutter doesn't look too bad here: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfreerider Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 I think that is from the A7, not the A7s. The A7 does some sort of line skipping /pixel binning on the sensor, so it will probably have less rolling shutter than the A7s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rungunshoot Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 Here's a domestic test, rolling shutter doesn't look too bad here: Yeah, the DR looks not so awesome in that one as well. Blown highlights. Probably a7 or a7r. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wulf Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 Yeah, it was really hard to keep the colors from posterizing. Maybe there's a trick to keeping stuff natural looking when re-saturating 8-bit log footage... Of course, the easy way out is to keep the log look to the footage, maybe tinting it overall warm or teal, but I think that trend is getting a little stale. And it works best for bleak subject matter...I think most brides would shoot their wedding videographer if they received an ultraflat grade as the final product. So the sweet spot with the A7s is probably a mixture of picture styles and S-Log, depending on subject matter. I'm NOT an expert in grading movies, but if I had to fight this is photoshop, I would just try to add another complete desaturated black/white level (via 'calculations'), quite subtle around 15-25 % ... and mainly in the shadows. But your 5D in raw rocks more... Probably you are absolutely right by involving picture styles - often I'm wondering what's the reason to shot everything ultraflat. Even with 14 bit raw stills, it proves to be really difficult in photoshop to create a acceptable, natural look other than the actual light situation during the shoot. I found it's much easier to wait until conditions are better... :-) or at least as you said trying to optimize the shot as much as possible in cam, especially with 8 bit footage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgharding Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 Yeah, the DR looks not so awesome in that one as well. Blown highlights. Probably a7 or a7r. Ah yeah it seems I posted non A7s by mistake, apologies! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_David Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 Here's a grade I did of recent A7S footage - all looks really good - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imaginate Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 If you're "run and gunning" you won't really be swapping lenses anyway. So just buy one 10-stop ND filter and maybe add a vari ND. I don't know how bad the rolling shutter is compared to the 5D, but I've seen films with a lot of action, such as The Raid, where you can see things bending whenever the camera moved fast. However, the rolling shutter didn't really harm the fast paced movements at all. Yes you can switch lenses if you have an assistant(PA budget is the best spent money on set) and yes there are times when you can take advantage of the RS, but mostly it's a very annoying workaround. Funny how most of the responses on here have been how to technically avoid RS, but none have offered an answer to shooting with it. The dynamic range with SLog will totally blow the crap out of GH4, as well as low light performance, probably 4 stop advantage in video mode. I would like to see 5D III raw vs A7s Slog Even Alexa has rolling shutter. I get it. Some folks really need DR(although most are just shooting crap for vimeo). DR isn't king though. To me the images out of 99% of the footage that I've seen from the a7s are pretty flat, lack color depth and don't really excite me. The one small clip that I've seen of the 10 bit footage from the GH4 blows away even the the Den Lennie footage in 4k that is graded. Call me crazy, but again I've seen enough. To me the with a 10 bit(doesn't have to be 4k)recorder the gh4 is a poor mans RED. The a7s footage looks just like a beefed up 5d with more DR(even on Den's footage). I have a 5D fully hacked RAW and while it's good it's DR isn't as good as you think(the 14bit footage is amazing to grade though). You have to consider the fact that you're using a hacked camera, which has totally overheated on me shooting only 35mins of RAW at a concert. The bottom line is that it is still a hacked camera and really not one that should be used on hired gig. Have you even used a 5D hacked? You can't review footage in real time, it doesn't always record the clip(95%rate, but still not good enough), and it's fucking nightmare in post to work with. I've run ML many times on shoots, but due to the fickle nature of RAW, I end up shooting h.264 most of the time to be safe. So yeah. I'm gladly switching to a GH4 that has an unlimited record time, 10 bit output and I really like the subtle softness of the m 4/3 look. Biased? Maybe, but consider that I was a dedicated Canon shooter(C100 and mkIII) until a few months ago... Full frame and DR aren't the end all be all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imaginate Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 I guess I should mention that I don't like the Sony image at all. I had a sony PD-150 and I've hated the Sony image since. The Z1-U sucked and I have owned a Panny HVX-2000 since day one, so I'm probably not the most unbiased person on here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gelaxstudio Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 This is a comment from alex (a C300 and GH4 user),comment from www.fstopacademy.com,7S hand on shooting review: Alex said: For anyone who’s concerned about grading the 8bit of this camera vs 10bit of the GH4… I think it’s going to be a non-issue! Testing yesterday, with the GH4 recording 10bit to a Ninja Blade, I found I could push the 8 bit internally recorded image from my C300 (50 Mbit) WAAAAAY further before either fell apart! Specifically I was trying to see if I could underexpose to protect highlights in high contrast documentary interview situations. With the C300 I could push the midtones up by 25% (probably even more with a de-noiser) before I would start to feel uncomfortable about using them. The GH4, however… I couldn’t move push the midtones more than about 5% before it looked too ugly. I fiddled with the NR settings, shadows, highlights, contrast, Cine D Profile, Natural Profile, but nothing made me smile and go… “Yeah! I like that.†As he said, GH4 with IPB code perform badly in color,and I don't know whether the 10 bit will help,but it may not be worthy because it requires a external recorder to do so. In a A7S review from Newsshooter.com,W. Ashley Maddox said: it(A7S) had a natural grain look to it vs. the muddy blacks that I am seeing in the GH4. Compared to the FS700’s AVCHD, the XAVC codec is way easier to grade. so,both camera in the same 8 bit color but xavc does performs better than the IPB(the same code as AVCHD ) code on the GH4! What a shame that GH4 is not using a better code instead of IPB! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgharding Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 From all the footage I've been playing with I've found the same thing. C100 AVCHD is far more pliable in post than the GH4 4K, which shouldn't make sense, but just goes to show numbers aren't everything. Not sure what it is they're doing but I'm not a fan of the baked-in contrast either. 10-bit external recorder colour is better, but still I don't really feel the GH4 image that much, just not to my tastes. Of course you can make something amazing with it, but it's a personal thing, what gives you a vibe as it were. I much prefer the A7s 4K too, though it is of course much more expensive to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.