mercer Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 On August 12, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Matt Kieley said: It's my only camera, aside from my iPhone. I had to sell the bmpcc to pay for the T2i and lenses. I am hoping later down the line to add a GH4 and/or DJI Osmo to my bag, whenever I can afford them. So far so good? I was surprised to learn that Kendy Ty switched to the a6300... Strangely I feel a little let down by it. Oh well, I'm over it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Kieley Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 2 hours ago, mercer said: So far so good? I was surprised to learn that Kendy Ty switched to the a6300... Strangely I feel a little let down by it. Oh well, I'm over it now. I like it a lot so far, especially with Magic Lantern. It's nice having False Color built right in, no external monitor required. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff CB Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 On 8/9/2016 at 2:02 PM, jgharding said: Don't suppose you're interested in a 1970s 35mm one are you? Complete with EF adapter! Cost? I might be interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff CB Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 Gave the 24-70 GM a go this past weekend. Pretty impressed. Great rendering and incredibly sharp. AF was great overall except it seems it's bad for about 30 seconds after turning on the camera. Annoying when trying to conserve battery. Shot on the a7r2 with custom settings in Full Frame mode. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted August 15, 2016 Share Posted August 15, 2016 anyone willing to trade a Samsung 16-50s for a Contax Zeiss 85mm f1.4 AEG ? :-D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted August 15, 2016 Share Posted August 15, 2016 15 minutes ago, kidzrevil said: anyone willing to trade a Samsung 16-50s for a Contax Zeiss 85mm f1.4 AEG ? :-D Nooo... Don't do it. iamoui 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandro Posted August 15, 2016 Share Posted August 15, 2016 My dear Nikkor 35mm F2 AI-S on the NX1 iamoui, kidzrevil and mercer 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted August 15, 2016 Share Posted August 15, 2016 2 hours ago, sandro said: My dear Nikkor 35mm F2 AI-S on the NX1 Looks great!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandro Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 It just has a little bit of ghosting wide open Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgharding Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 On 14/08/2016 at 3:14 PM, Geoff CB said: Cost? I might be interested. Let's do a PM thread and I can fill you in! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandro Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 The new Nikon E lenses with "electronic aperture" means they don't have an aperture lever so useless on dump adapters? If yes is Nikon going the Canon way? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil A Posted August 23, 2016 Share Posted August 23, 2016 It means exactly that. If no one makes a Smart Nikon adapter, those new lenses with electronic diaphragm won't be usable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noone Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 On 26/07/2016 at 3:13 AM, BrorSvensson said: May i ask why its pointless? its the longest f1.4 dslr lens, it will be amazing for portraits. There is that 135 1.4 Mitakon that you can buy for Nikon DSLRs. Very limited edition and manual focus though (100 only in all mounts). The new Nikon should be a very nice lens though wont be quite as shallow for depth of field as a Canon 85 1.2 (for the same framing) - not that it wont be more than shallow enough anyway. Now that the Nikon 105 1.4 is going to be around soon, it should be nice to see what it can do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hempo22 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Some screen grabs of the Zeiss 12-120 T2.4 on the Digital Bolex. All at base ISO (200) and 180 degree shutter at 1080p25. No LUTs or filters, just a basic contrast curve and a two stop exposure push (and scope cropping on some, haha) Geoff CB 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hempo22 Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Two more with the Zeiss 12-120mm T2.4 on the Digital Bolex, this time indoors. The wide shot is with the Aspheron wide angle attachment (6,6mm!). ISO 400, T4, 172.8 degree shutter at 2k24p. freeman, Justin Bacle and Geoff CB 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 does anyone own the contax zeiss 35mm f1.4 and would like to trade it for a contax zeiss 28mm f2 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 1 hour ago, kidzrevil said: does anyone own the contax zeiss 35mm f1.4 and would like to trade it for a contax zeiss 28mm f2 ? Not feeling the focal length? Or does the Hollywood have too much character for your taste? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 @TheRenaissanceMan lmao ! It looks fine its the focal length. I find myself not wanting to go wider than a 50-53mm equivalent on apsc, thats just been my style lately Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 I believe Ebrahim has a spare one he could send you. All old and lame jokes aside; surprises me you're willing to part with the Hollywood lens. I only have f/2.8s unfortunately (but count myself fortunate enough to have 'em in the first place, though). Though, with longer focal length you do more easily get more of that Zeiss pop/rendering/bokeh in your shots. kidzrevil 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted September 6, 2016 Share Posted September 6, 2016 @Cinegain lmao and im sure there's a bridge Ebrahim has up for sale as well seriously though I love the hollywood and the only thing that could replace it is the contax zeiss 35 f1.4. Like you said the longer focal lengths have that zeiss although you can get it at close focus distances on the 28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.