Guest d5f8611fa423d0e628c016f9d5c93b47 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 It improves my "image" with the ladies You're obviously a better man than me. I'll ignore all your posts from this point on. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted June 6, 2014 Administrators Share Posted June 6, 2014 A lot of people are viewing the GH4 4K material on 2.5K or 1080p displays and there's crude downscaling going on which results in an over-sharp image and even some heavy aliasing. A lot of the YouTube stuff looks thin and sharp because of compression and bad downscaling. First time I graded the GH4 files I was pretty happy and yet we've only realised half the camera's potential so far. Once we get the Atomos Shogun we will be getting uncompressed 10bit 4:2:2 4K out of the HDMI port. DXOMark tested the raw output GX7's sensor (similar to the one in the GH4) and it rates for about 11.8 stops dynamic range, pretty much identical to the 5D Mark III. The GH2 and 5D2 have been around for ages and the GH4 is a far bigger step up from the GH2 than the 5D3 is from the Mk II. Michael - ignorance of the reason other people choose to shoot with the GH4 does not make a good debate. Also remember that the filmmaking world is small and you are using your real name on the forum, if you piss someone off, eventually it will come back round. There's no career advantage to behaving like a complete prat in front of half the digital filmmaking community. themartist, rndmtsk, dahlfors and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richg101 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 topic locked. Daniel Acuña, Andrew Reid, Hans Punk and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts