Inazuma Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 Thanks. I went back to square one after having quite a few unsuccessful attempts and remembered and old video from me, which i really liked:The filter makes such a difference. I'm surprised not more people bought it after we talking about it jase, Cinegain and sanveer 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 The filter makes such a difference. I'm surprised not more people bought it after we talking about itI did, actually. It's definitly a great addition for the times you want to go with that low contrast look. The Tokina RMCs do a pretty sweet job of that too (have the 28-85mm f/4 myself). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jase Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 I did a very quick and dirty edit: benymypony and 1tkman 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inazuma Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 I did a very quick and dirty edit:Good job Only thing is I would avoid shooting into the sun with the filter on. Bit of a hassle I know but it causes all the detail in the shadows to go awayWhat picture settings did you use btw?Also I've decided finally that Im going to get this camera! sgreszcz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jase Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Same settings we discussed several months ago, @Inazuma - seems to work on the lx100 as a charm.Recipe is as follows:Standard with -5,-5,-5,-5Highlight / Shadow 0,0Iso was Auto, but i guess it was 200-400Tiffen Ultra Contrast 3 FilterFilmConvert with GH4 Profile, FJ SuperX 400 emulation was used with 30% grainSome slight adjustment in the shadows to give it more contrast, thats it. Works out of the box on the GM1 and seems to work out of the box on the LX100.The lx100 is really a gem - i did not hold it steady as shown in the video above, but i think the OIS does a pretty decent job. Also focus was often wrong since i tried the autofocus. However the focusring is very smooth. Not as nice as on the Voigtländer 25mm, but still good enough. I think this is an amazing package for what it costs currently. You wont regret it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Good job Only thing is I would avoid shooting into the sun with the filter on. Bit of a hassle I know but it causes all the detail in the shadows to go awayWhat picture settings did you use btw?Also I've decided finally that Im going to get this camera!I have also decided to get the LX100 and see what all the fuss is about You can get it here for £340 after cashback! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jase Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I have also decided to get the LX100 and see what all the fuss is about You can get it here for £340 after cashback!absolute bargain! used ones cost arround 530euro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I was looking at the A6000 or the RX100 M3 but that price has swayed me towards the LX100 for family outings to capture photos and small video snippets when not wanting to cart around the heavier Nikon gear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 How well could the LX100 match colour with the Nikon D750? A total nightmare or good enough for LX100 wide shots and in 4k > 1080p on the timeline? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inazuma Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Has anyone else tried using a step-up filter with this? It ends up blocking the lens' retraction and extension when you turn it off/on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Can't say that I have. Still the case if you remove the accessory ring?Maybe a step-down then step-up combo could work? jase 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inazuma Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Can't say that I have. Still the case if you remove the accessory ring?Maybe a step-down then step-up combo could work?Ah thanks! I had no idea that ring was removable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jase Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Can't say that I have. Still the case if you remove the accessory ring?ahhhh, thanks a lot! that saved me a lot of troubles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inazuma Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Did you guys know that there is actually hidden highlight information in the video files? I was playing around with a LUT I made earlier this year and it was revealing information in the highlights that I thought could not possibly be there because when I messed around with the various exposure sliders in Premiere Pro, there was no detail there. But my LUT brought it out. So after discarding the LUT I added the Three Way Color Corrector effect and brought the output level from 255 to 235.. and voila there was the highlight information. benymypony 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Kotlos Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Did you guys know that there is actually hidden highlight information in the video files? I was playing around with a LUT I made earlier this year and it was revealing information in the highlights that I thought could not possibly be there because when I messed around with the various exposure sliders in Premiere Pro, there was no detail there. But my LUT brought it out. So after discarding the LUT I added the Three Way Color Corrector effect and brought the output level from 255 to 235.. and voila there was the highlight information.This is because Premiere misinterprets the 0-255 data as being 16-235 range. Same problem with NX1 files that have 0-255 range. You can also use adjust the levels instead of doing it with an LUT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inazuma Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 This is because Premiere misinterprets the 0-255 data as being 16-235 range. Same problem with NX1 files that have 0-255 range. You can also use adjust the levels instead of doing it with an LUT.Is there a way to change how Premiere works with the files so that I don't have to manually apply the correction every time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Kotlos Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Is there a way to change how Premiere works with the files so that I don't have to manually apply the correction every time?Which version of Premiere are you using? I am surprised that it does this since it correctly recognizes the GH4 footage. Unfortunatelly I don't know of a way to force Premiere to use the 0-255 range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgreszcz Posted September 17, 2015 Share Posted September 17, 2015 Ah thanks! I had no idea that ring was removable Yep, you need to take the small ring off to expose the thread (more) and there is a gap where the automatic lens cap grips on to.I spent all summer with just this camera, a 3 and 6 stop ND filter, this ThinkTank Mirrorless Mover 5 bag, a couple of 128GB SD cards, and an extra battery. I use a Heliopan 43-58mm step up ring and 58mm Xume magnetic adaptors to pop on and off the ND (which I sort of use like a lens cap). You can also find a cheap JJC automatic lens cap that is helpful for one-handed shooting (if you aren't using filters). Using the 4k resolution @ 1080p you can get an effective zoom range of 24-150mm, which is good enough for what I shoot. The OIS is quite effective too - much better than I was getting on my Panasonic 35-100/2.8 (although I haven't compared to the P12-35/2.8.I do wish the camera had a better EVF (tilting like GX7/GX8!) and also rear tilt LCD screen. I find the focus peaking very faint in video mode for some reason, especially compared to my E-M5II which is a joy to use and quite visible at all times. It would be useful to have a small mic-in jack and clean HDMI out to use something like the SteadXP device, or the new Rode micros. It would also be good to be able to set the shutter angle (like in the GH4), which would make it easier switching between stills and video, especially in a PAL region where you need to jog the rear wheel to 1/50. When I'm running around, I generally shoot with auto-iso, the aperture dial in auto, the shutter at 1/50 and switch between the two ND filters depending on the light.I'm really glad more people are getting this little camera, as I still have much to learn from others about getting the best out of it. Right now I'm using Natural, -3, -5, -2, 0 as others on the forum have been using with other Panasonic cameras. buggz, sanveer and jase 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jase Posted September 20, 2015 Share Posted September 20, 2015 Here are some screencaps from Berlin's Lollapalooza Festival. First real try with the LX100. These are just some very quick & dirty tests (with too much film grain), but i have to say this combo is really great considering the price. Nikkor, benymypony, 1tkman and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inazuma Posted September 20, 2015 Share Posted September 20, 2015 Good stuff. Im going to Budapest for a few days soon so hoping to get some good shots there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.