hmcindie Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Like Final Cut X?That worked out well for them.I'd love to see a camera created by Apple. It'll probably look good with great performance but won't fit in any existing workflow. Actually... aren't those the blackmagic cams? So what are you people complaining, go buy them! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted December 24, 2014 Author Administrators Share Posted December 24, 2014 Blackmagic shoots ProRes. ProRes doesn't fit in any existing workflow? Hmm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtheory Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Apple's iCamera will not have Aperture, Shutter or ISO controls, it will just have one setting: "Brighter" and "Darker", because SIMPLICITY, YO! *shudder* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jax_rox Posted December 25, 2014 Share Posted December 25, 2014 Like Final Cut X?That worked out well for them.You mean the time they released a product that the internet and professionals were collectively unhappy with, and yet it sold incredibly strongly and made lots of money for Apple?The userbase may have switched from pro to pro-sumer or amateur, but it's not like they saw a major decline in number of users... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtheory Posted December 25, 2014 Share Posted December 25, 2014 but it's not like they saw a major decline in number of users...No, only the quality of users and work. I would've never believed 6-7 years ago they will lose Fincher to Premiere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jax_rox Posted December 25, 2014 Share Posted December 25, 2014 No, only the quality of users and work. I would've never believed 6-7 years ago they will lose Fincher to Premiere. For sure. But FCP went from a professional application marketed towards a nice market, to a pro-sumer application that was able to tap into a much bigger market.And it worked, despite what everyone has said about it - I personally made the switch to Avid, and never looked back. But you can't say FCPX was a failure for Apple as it simply wasn't, despite the talk about it all over the internet and the fact that it had become much less of a professional tool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmcindie Posted December 27, 2014 Share Posted December 27, 2014 You mean the time they released a product that the internet and professionals were collectively unhappy with, and yet it sold incredibly strongly and made lots of money for Apple?The userbase may have switched from pro to pro-sumer or amateur, but it's not like they saw a major decline in number of users...They are not mutually exclusive. You can sell products to the prosumers and amateurs without taking away the pro-software. As a "professional" I don't care how much software Apple sells if I don't want to use that same software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted December 27, 2014 Author Administrators Share Posted December 27, 2014 What the Apple guy's referring to is the capacity for innovation at Apple when you have a less general-concensous based way of designing products. Ask people what they want sometimes is not the right thing to do. Giving them something they didn't expect is more innovative and in the long run can be more profitable too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtheory Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Yeah..I remember reading somewhere about the invention of the fork, yes the fork. Apparently a Roman princess from some barbarian province first brought it to the royal court, terrifying everyone with her "two-horned satanic stake". I think it was banned for some time before finally being accepted, with Italians using it for pasta and English adding a third "horn". So much for market research. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted December 28, 2014 Author Administrators Share Posted December 28, 2014 Eventually a fork becomes a spork. Convergence Development of the fork forks off. mtheory 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.