Tito Ferradans Posted February 21, 2017 Author Share Posted February 21, 2017 4 hours ago, Mike Needs said: Thank you for the reply!.. I am very new to the anamorphic world, and I am just realising the size on this monster!.. do you think it would be single focus or double?.. many thanks again Mikey That I know. Double focus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Needs Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 4 hours ago, Tito Ferradans said: That I know. Double focus. Cheers Tito!!..saved me from a wrong purchase!...btw great youtube channel!!.... Tito Ferradans 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tito Ferradans Posted February 23, 2017 Author Share Posted February 23, 2017 Thank you! :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 On 2017-02-21 at 6:23 PM, Mike Needs said: Cheers Tito!!..saved me from a wrong purchase!...btw great youtube channel!!.... Basically, no single focus lens less than $2k nowadays. Mike Needs 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzpop Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 4 hours ago, ken said: Basically, no single focus lens less than $2k nowadays. yeah , i guess i'll bite the iscorama bullet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timotheus Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 2 hours ago, bzpop said: yeah , i guess i'll bite the iscorama bullet ...or buy a single focus solution a la Rectilux of SLR Magic Rangefinder. But you probably considered that already :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzpop Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 SLR Magic rangefinder lived on my camera for couple days, and went back home:) it softens picture, not a lot, but still, and it makes setup bulky, for the same reason i am not after Core DNA, not giving up my small form factor for anything, well relatively small, so most likely Isco 36 or 42, but i still can't decide between single focus and 2x squeeze, 2x is so freakin good, i just love it! Timotheus 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tito Ferradans Posted September 11, 2017 Author Share Posted September 11, 2017 Damn! I just remembered this thread, and I've posted a decent number of videos since the last update! hahaha ANAMORPHIC COOKBOOK - A CRY FOR HELPhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=8752 ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - SINGLE FOCUS SHOOTOUThttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=9496 ANAMORPHIC CHOP SHOP - ANAMORPHIC MUMPS CORRECTORhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13852 ANAMORPHIC COOKBOOK - UPCOMING, 2017http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13941 ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - CINEMORPH SIGMA 18-35MM F/1.8 ARThttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13960 ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - CINEMORPH FILTERShttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13998 ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - SLR MAGIC ANAMORPHOT 1.33X-40http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13954 ANAMORPHIC CHOP SHOP - SLR MAGIC FLARE FIXhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14073 ANAMORPHIC CHOP SHOP - ANAMORPHIC AND DAVINCI RESOLVEhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14107 ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - KOWA 8-Zhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13963 ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - SANKOR 16-Dhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13962 ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - ISCO ULTRA STARhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14072 ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - SINGLE FOCUS SHOOTOUT "HELD"http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14158 ANAMORPHIC COOKBOOK - WE'RE BACK ON A BUDGET!http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14179 ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - LETUS ANAMORPHX-GP 1.33Xhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13953 ANAMORPHIC CHOP SHOP - INSTALLING THE LETUS ANAMORPHX-GPhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13958 And, on the side, I had a few narrative projects that I posted about, in case anyone is interested in the stuff I do besides the reviews! OVERNIGHT - PRODUCTION OVERVIEWhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14090 OVERNIGHT - PRODUCTION UPDATEhttp://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14106 UP & AWAY - INDIEGOGO CAMPAIGN BTM_Pix and Justin Bacle 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eris Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 Here's a very nice Sankor 16 test. Grimor 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweak Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 On 25/02/2017 at 3:15 AM, bzpop said: but i still can't decide between single focus and 2x squeeze, 2x is so freakin good, i just love it! I can't really see the point in 1.5x, if you're going to all that hassle and expense you might as well go the whole way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eris Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 On 10/21/2017 at 11:17 PM, tweak said: I can't really see the point in 1.5x, if you're going to all that hassle and expense you might as well go the whole way. Because 1.5x will take HD or UHD (present on all cameras) and convert it to scope. That's why Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzpop Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 43 minutes ago, eris said: Because 1.5x will take HD or UHD (present on all cameras) and convert it to scope. That's why true that, but to me anamorphic is not about convenience, it is about the look:) tweak 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eris Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 35 minutes ago, bzpop said: true that, but to me anamorphic is not about convenience, it is about the look:) True enough. 1.5x looks pretty good. significantly better than 1.3x which I agree -- why bother. I'm tending towards 2x now that the GH5 has great support and CoreDNA is available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweak Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 10 hours ago, bzpop said: true that, but to me anamorphic is not about convenience, it is about the look:) Exactly. And as pointed out, most cameras like GH5 de-squeeze a 2x image, which is in the price range for someone buying an Iscorama (If you're using more expensive camera i.e Alexa etc, you'd just rent 2x lenses). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzpop Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 don't really care much about desqueeze, and not i don't even use it on GH5, as long as i can see the whole frame it doesn't matter to me , but 4:3 mode is an awesome feature, can't wait til Adobe will bring the 6K footage fix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eris Posted November 9, 2017 Share Posted November 9, 2017 On 11/3/2017 at 1:57 PM, bzpop said: don't really care much about desqueeze, and not i don't even use it on GH5, as long as i can see the whole frame it doesn't matter to me , but 4:3 mode is an awesome feature, can't wait til Adobe will bring the 6K footage fix Agreed. Don't use on-camera de-squeeze since my monitor can do 1.3, 1.5, 1.75 and 2x. I guess it would be important if you're going lightweight. My DP, Mauri Galiano tried the GH5 in open-gate 6k anamorphic with a variety of 2x lenses. He said it's fantastic and the only problem right now is there's a bug in H265 decoding in Premiere. I use Davinci so it's not so much of an issue. Now I just need to get a good mount for my Sankor 16D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buggz Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 Just have to say, I am STILL loving my GH5 in 6K anamorphic with my Kowa for B&H 2x rig! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.