lafilm Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Save up your pennies guys :P http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2014/12/shes-a-dslr-killa-canon-c100-mark-ii/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/p/ Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 >Sponsored by Canon nahua, Ed_David, Zach Goodwin and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inazuma Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Looks like they paid the kid in wine. His mouth is so black! Ed_David 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrad Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 He also said the 5d Mk II on any setting trashes anything the GH4 can put out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrgl Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Who? ;) From what I've seen this is a great camera. But cost and codec are totally unappealing to me. Thank you for sharing the link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzynormal Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Opinions are like... Ed_David 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseywilsondp Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 At $5500 for just the body, that's like saying the fs7 or scsarlet dragon is a c100 mk2 killer. Oh really your camera that costs twice as much as a standard DSLR is better? Amazing. It does look cool though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I really do respect a lot whatever Shane Hurlbut has to say about filmmaking, until... he opens his mount and mentions Canon! :-/ Then it just becomes silly. He mentions the FS700 but doesn't even mention the FS7 once in that entire article? WTF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tosvus Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 well.. For one, I think his math is a bit off.. and woohoo, frame rate increased to 60p (in 1920x1080..) "requires an external recorder to get the most out of it) - yeah I suppose at a mere $5995, it is too much to ask for it to deliver this internally.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 >Sponsored by Canon Yeah the guy needs a disclaimer on that article. :angry: I've suddenly come over all Christian Bale about him ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatalfury Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 It's really hard to take him seriously after what he said about 5D Mark II trashing GH4. johnnymossville, Zach Goodwin, IronFilm and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 The Canon C100 Mark 2 is a highly user-friendly camera that's solid on all fronts with an apparently lovely image straight out of the box. That's its real attraction. But this review... and the GH4 one. Jeez louise. He lost all my confidence at "This [GH4] fails in every way except shooting bark on trees". Well, for $5500 I can buy me a whole lot of beautiful bark-shooting action! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted December 16, 2014 Administrators Share Posted December 16, 2014 It's news to me that the C100 Mark II's image competes with the full frame A7S 4K output, or the 10bit 4K GH4 output or the NX1's 4K output oversampled from a 6.5K sensor output. "DSLR killer" it isn't. johnnymossville, Zach Ashcraft and caseywilsondp 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oliver Daniel Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 I really do respect a lot whatever Shane Hurlbut has to say about filmmaking, until... he opens his mount and mentions Canon! :-/ Then it just becomes silly. He mentions the FS700 but doesn't even mention the FS7 once in that entire article? WTF I actually have on my desk right now - the FS7. I've not even turned it on yet but this thing is incredible. It's built like a rock and the grip is the best thing about it. Shooting a music video with a RAAAR RAAAR band on FS7 + a GH4 on a drone in a mental asylum with no roof tomorrow. What was Shane on about again? :P Zach Ashcraft, IronFilm, johnnymossville and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted December 16, 2014 Administrators Share Posted December 16, 2014 Glad you got the FS7. The more people keep buying the old 1080p stuff from Canon the more they are going to keep the 4K stuff in the vault and coast along. They can sell us a $5k 1080p camera and then also a $8k 4K camera at some point in 2015. Such profit. Please people stop buying dated equipment and reward the innovators like Sony... Oliver Daniel, Daniel Acuña, IronFilm and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnymossville Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 At least he puts his sponsored by Canon Logo on top of his page as a proper disclaimer to anything he says. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
froess Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Saying it's a dslr killer it's a bit dum as this is on another league in my opinion. It has proper audio, better resolution, canon log and is a vÃdeo camera, not a stills camera. the examples Shane showed were great in my opinion and a good exemple that the camera in capable hands can produce a very nice image. As most cameras do... PS: I don't agree just because the other cameras can output 4k or record it internally that are straight better than the c100 MkII. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted December 16, 2014 Administrators Share Posted December 16, 2014 "Better resolution" froess. Can only laugh at that. You must be completely blind to say the 1080p on the C100 Mark II has better resolution than the NX1 internal 4K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
froess Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 better resolution than the standard dslr. of course against a 4k picture is loses but i wouldn't consider the c100 as soft picture comparing with the other canon dslrs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
froess Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 but i still don't understand people that compare a 4k camera against an hd one and complain when the hd camera loses Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.