BenEricson Posted December 7, 2018 Share Posted December 7, 2018 21 hours ago, henricus said: Thanks! I guess it’s time to tryout the 4K ? I got mine for $700 ? So it’s best to keep the aperture above F3.5? ? I did shoot a lot of test footage at F2.8.. You may have seen this, but I shot this when I first bought the camera. Looking at this footage reminds of how crazy easy the camera is to shoot with and how good the stabilizer on the long end is crazy good. The shots at :09 were shot on the "standard" profile I believe, with the NR and Sharpening all the way down. They seem to have a thicker color than the other clips I shot. You could easily cut shots like that with a C300 and not notice. The indoor shots are all ETTR (expose to the right, kept the clouds jammed to the right on the histogram.) The highlights are so soft I don't think it would matter if they clipped anyway. mercer and henricus 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted December 7, 2018 Share Posted December 7, 2018 On 12/2/2018 at 4:35 PM, henricus said: My xc10 is a pal version, so somehow 24p is not an option. Can you switch it over to NTSC? Maybe then you can see 24p as an option?? BenEricson 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted December 7, 2018 Share Posted December 7, 2018 On 12/2/2018 at 4:35 PM, henricus said: I have now attached a 2 stop ND filter, this together with the built in 3 stop ND filter shoukd make it easier to keep the iso low enough. ISO?? Are you confusing ISO and shutter speed with each other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henricus Posted December 7, 2018 Share Posted December 7, 2018 1 hour ago, IronFilm said: ISO?? Are you confusing ISO and shutter speed with each other? yep 1 hour ago, IronFilm said: Can you switch it over to NTSC? Maybe then you can see 24p as an option?? not possible 3 hours ago, BenEricson said: You may have seen this, but I shot this when I first bought the camera. Looking at this footage reminds of how crazy easy the camera is to shoot with and how good the stabilizer on the long end is crazy good. The shots at :09 were shot on the "standard" profile I believe, with the NR and Sharpening all the way down. They seem to have a thicker color than the other clips I shot. You could easily cut shots like that with a C300 and not notice. The indoor shots are all ETTR (expose to the right, kept the clouds jammed to the right on the histogram.) The highlights are so soft I don't think it would matter if they clipped anyway. Yes I have seen it already. This is one of the great examples what the XC10 can do! And I thought that was all done in C-log.. Can you elaborate a bit on what your grading process was like with the XC10? I like the natural look of your footage. When you say standard, do you mean profile 1 or 2? I am testing 4k c-log 500 iso now, looks much better already! It seems like it is best to ETTR just a bit from reading of the camera's meter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenEricson Posted December 8, 2018 Share Posted December 8, 2018 17 hours ago, henricus said: yep not possible Yes I have seen it already. This is one of the great examples what the XC10 can do! And I thought that was all done in C-log.. Can you elaborate a bit on what your grading process was like with the XC10? I like the natural look of your footage. When you say standard, do you mean profile 1 or 2? I am testing 4k c-log 500 iso now, looks much better already! It seems like it is best to ETTR just a bit from reading of the camera's meter. I was using the C300 Log 2 or 3 LUT? Probably not the proper way to do it, but I am happy with the results. Sorry, I can't remember which profile it was. Early on people were recommending it as the best profile with the least amount of NR. henricus 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henricus Posted December 8, 2018 Share Posted December 8, 2018 4 hours ago, BenEricson said: I was using the C300 Log 2 or 3 LUT? Probably not the proper way to do it, but I am happy with the results. Sorry, I can't remember which profile it was. Early on people were recommending it as the best profile with the least amount of NR. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henricus Posted December 8, 2018 Share Posted December 8, 2018 You also used that c300 log lut for the standard profile? 10 hours ago, BenEricson said: I was using the C300 Log 2 or 3 LUT? Probably not the proper way to do it, but I am happy with the results. Sorry, I can't remember which profile it was. Early on people were recommending it as the best profile with the least amount of NR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenEricson Posted December 8, 2018 Share Posted December 8, 2018 3 hours ago, henricus said: You also used that c300 log lut for the standard profile? Nah, I don’t think I really touched those files. Maybe used the three way color to ease off the black level a tiny bit or shift the WB. henricus 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batou Bato Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 xc10 test thebrothersthre3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Batou Bato said: xc10 test Looks good! How are you finding the camera? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batou Bato Posted February 7, 2019 Share Posted February 7, 2019 hi @kyeI had the same impression as @Mattias Burling (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGEYd863ekw) i don't like "I hate" manual focus By Wire, for me it's the biggest problem with this camera kye 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.