Peter Rzazewski Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 Between the 100Mbps and 200Mbps 60p modes, do you think that the 200Mbps is significantly better than the 100Mbps? I notice that it uses significantly more space on the card which, for me mean, a bigger headache in post. Others have said that the 200Mbps ALL-i actually fluctuates between high and very low. Is the 100Mbps safer to get a consistent quality in 60p (for the purposes of conforming to 24p to make slow motion)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcs Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 High bitrate ALL-I can be useful for fast motion shots. Otherwise, most people don't see any difference vs. lower bitrate IPB. You can see for yourself by doing a few test shots and examining the footage at 100-400% in your NLE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldolega Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 All-I gives you more accurate motion, at the cost of larger files and a small hit to detail. I use it for shots with a ton of fast dynamic motion. IPB gives you smaller files, and more detail, provided that not too many things in the frame are moving/changing too quickly.Examples of when I would use each:-fast pan/tilt/etc with lots of background detail moving through the frame- All-I.-slower move or locked-off shot, with background detail moving slowly or not at all- IPB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcs Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 What we need is a more efficient implementation of IPB: one that switches to ALL-I when then encoder can't hit performance targets for IPB (large motion vectors, etc.). This would allow ALL-I spiking to well over 200Mbps (up to the limit of the hardware write speed). Manually switching between ALL-I and IPB shouldn't be required: computers are supposed to make things easier Julian and Cinegain 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j.f.r. Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 If anyone can show me video to clearly prove this I would agree, unfortunately no one will as you simply cannot tell.... If this is for the GH4 your best bet is recording Pro Res to an external recorder, but even still it's very hard to tell with that camera. Honestly not a fan at all of the GH4...... Average dynamic range, poor in low light and the best thing about it is 4k resolution..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Rzazewski Posted June 11, 2015 Author Share Posted June 11, 2015 I just sold the GH4 and upgraded to the C100 Mark II. Aside from not having 4k, Im thrilled with the C100 so far. I won't go on about it here but it's freaking amazing (built in nd, dual slot recording proxies, log profile, 60p, small but high DR files, wifi, xlr,)... ill stop now. AaronChicago and Wulf 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.