Emanuel Posted July 4 Share Posted July 4 How many of you? Two aspects to consider: 1) When some insight you get from apples to oranges principle and you end to buy another you wouldn't be willing to, but you end to conclude not much else you can do... : D 2) When you try to see any difference from and add no reason to find any... you can always blame the comparative term or/and man behind anyway... YT is a load of it : P This is coming from a different discussion here though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zlfan Posted July 4 Share Posted July 4 I think application scenarios are very critical, as different application scenarios require different criteria for camera selection. for example, for run an gun events and news shooting, good ibis, c-af, good jpeg engine, streamlined ergonomics, redundant recording, etc are important. for indi shorts or features, low compression 12 bit raw is a must. once we have crystal clear scenarios and criteria, then camera selection makes sense. Emanuel 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 The application scenario is critical, of course. But first, the individual has to be aware that cameras exist to record footage that will be edited and then shown to viewers. The majority of discussions here are wilfully ignorant of that entire concept. Emanuel 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted July 5 Super Members Share Posted July 5 The only comparison that we all really need to do is of footage that we make from cameras that we own and of what other people are making with it. If theirs is better then the camera isn’t the problem and we should stick with what we have until we can make ours as good. And then don’t think of “upgrading” until we do. With any camera from the past five years (at least), the ceiling that we hit is usually our own capability rather than that of the camera. And, yes, I am absolutely flat broke after not being able to follow my own advice on this ! mercer and MrSMW 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSMW Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 1 hour ago, BTM_Pix said: If theirs is better then the camera isn’t the problem and we should stick with what we have until we can make ours as good. Absofuckinglutely. I see what others get out of the S5II and it’s always a case of ‘must work harder’ (an ongoing lifetime project) and never a case of ‘I need a better camera’. A smaller one. A lighter one. One with better (actual) IBIS, or AF that is reliable, all valid reasons to be looking elsewhere, but if it’s simply a case of your work looks a bit cack next to A.N. Others output, well that’s on us. BTM_Pix 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Hilton Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 I'm not addicted. I keep a casual eye on the industry purely out of interest. It's work for me, but also a hobby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.