SRV1981 Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 ArashM 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxJ4380 Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 Not sure what kind of look that guy is wearing, however its a hard (no thanks) from me. i refuse to watch anything with such dumb look to it. Maybe... i miss some interesting content but i can live with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSMW Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 Interested to see what DJI may do. Not interested in anything Toneh has to say on the matter. IronFilm and sanveer 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ND64 Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 14 minutes ago, MrSMW said: Interested to see what DJI may do. They are making motors for Ebikes now! But people expecting too much from them. They could make an open mount (market it as the first Chinese designed universal mount, if nationalism and independence from Japan is the concern) and let all the chinese lens makers do their thing. Could become complete line up in two years. But didn't. Instead introduced a drone friendly mount, limited it to APSC, with almost zero compatibility with their own Hasselblad mount. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSMW Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 Well as they are part of the L Mount Alliance, they have a huge lens option right there, so it’s just a body they need. IronFilm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eatstoomuchjam Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 9 hours ago, maxJ4380 said: Not sure what kind of look that guy is wearing, however its a hard (no thanks) from me. i refuse to watch anything with such dumb look to it. Maybe... i miss some interesting content but i can live with that. How dare you defame Toneh the great and Bokehfied? If he ever hears of it, he will cast a spell on you so that from here forward, every shot you take will have deep depth of field! 😆 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted October 7 Administrators Share Posted October 7 Since I am refusing to watch this crap can somebody summarise the video - does it have any evidence of a new camera or not, if not, then this thread is getting deleted. andrgl 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eatstoomuchjam Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 42 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said: Since I am refusing to watch this crap can somebody summarise the video - does it have any evidence of a new camera or not, if not, then this thread is getting deleted. He just regurgitates the same rumors as are on a bunch of websites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members BTM_Pix Posted October 7 Super Members Share Posted October 7 1 hour ago, Andrew Reid said: Since I am refusing to watch this crap can somebody summarise the video Yeah, as per usual, he's serving up more half baked nonsense. andrgl, MrSMW, Juank and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted October 7 Administrators Share Posted October 7 In that case, I'll replace the video with something with more value to the DJI discussion 🙂 Davide DB, Juank, eatstoomuchjam and 3 others 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eatstoomuchjam Posted October 7 Share Posted October 7 What heresy - I can tell in both of those images that there are cupboards just a few feet behind him and he's in a kitchen! Any proper image with Toneh should be at f/0.95 and I shouldn't be able to tell if he's in a kitchen, at a lake, or mountaineering! MrSMW, ArashM, sanveer and 1 other 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRV1981 Posted October 21 Author Share Posted October 21 So you run a forum and can just change the content of a thread because you dislike the source? What an odd culture KnightsFan and Phil A 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrgl Posted Monday at 11:18 AM Share Posted Monday at 11:18 AM 9 hours ago, SRV1981 said: So you run a forum and can just change the content of a thread because you dislike the source? What an odd culture Do you pay for the hosting fees? What an entitled #### SRV1981 and Phil A 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightsFan Posted Monday at 06:27 PM Share Posted Monday at 06:27 PM I agree with @SRV1981. Totally fair for Andrew to decide what is or isn't posted in his forum by deleting content or adding editor's notes, but I don't think it's good practice to change what a user wrote. @SRV1981 did not post the content that it looks like he posted and I think users should have the right to not be misrepresented as saying something they didnt, even if they don't pay hosting fees. I don't pay hosting fees on Facebook either. And I know in this case it's not life or death. I'm just saying I would be annoyed if my username was labeled as the author of something I didn't write or post. PannySVHS, SRV1981, Phil A and 1 other 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PannySVHS Posted Tuesday at 02:05 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 02:05 PM 19 hours ago, KnightsFan said: Totally fair for Andrew to decide what is or isn't posted in his forum by deleting content or adding editor's notes, but I don't think it's good practice to change what a user wrote. I agree on that. That is an essential notion and should not be in question. Commenting and deleting, yes. But in no way replacing content of someone under their name. The former is sometimes an editors necessary instrument. The latter is a nono, a pandoras box. More original og posts in the first place and less ad spamming would be a blessing though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted Tuesday at 03:39 PM Administrators Share Posted Tuesday at 03:39 PM 21 hours ago, KnightsFan said: I agree with @SRV1981. Totally fair for Andrew to decide what is or isn't posted in his forum by deleting content or adding editor's notes, but I don't think it's good practice to change what a user wrote. Who says I changed what a user wrote? Replacing a misleading and spammy youtube video with a picture is not doing that. And it sends a message that if you don't check your sources, or post poor quality outlinks, you will have it deleted. That's not about being unfair, that's about good moderation. 21 hours ago, KnightsFan said: @SRV1981 did not post the content that it looks like he posted and I think users should have the right to not be misrepresented as saying something they didnt, even if they don't pay hosting fees. I don't pay hosting fees on Facebook either. Why are you indulging an entitled whiner? The joke was made clear by me in the comments and there are far greater controversies you should be upset about, maybe gaza or something, but not this. Katrikura, SRV1981 and Phil A 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightsFan Posted Tuesday at 05:11 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:11 PM 1 hour ago, Andrew Reid said: Who says I changed what a user wrote? Replacing a misleading and spammy youtube video with a picture is not doing that. I understand the joke you were making about the dumb image being as useful as the original video, and I, as someone who saw the original title and video, and have some familiarity with the video author, chuckled at the picture. All I'm saying is that I also understand SRV's annoyance that to a random passerby who doesn't read the whole thread, his name is on a post that is no longer the content he posted. Thats regardless of who SRV is as a person (who i havent interacted with before), or the original post itself (which I thought was pointless, and orignally ignored). 1 hour ago, Andrew Reid said: Why are you indulging an entitled whiner? The joke was made clear by me in the comments and there are far greater controversies you should be upset about, maybe gaza or something, but not this. that's why I said it wasn't life or death as an ironic understatement. I'm not upset in any way. I thought andrgl's post was a bit harsh, so I spoke up. if I came across as upset or in support of rumor mill youtube videos, that was a miscommunication on my part. SRV1981 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted Tuesday at 09:32 PM Administrators Share Posted Tuesday at 09:32 PM You have some very good points, so I've edited the OP's post to better reflect his true love. eatstoomuchjam and sanveer 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRV1981 Posted Wednesday at 01:48 PM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 01:48 PM Immature reasoning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRV1981 Posted Wednesday at 01:53 PM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 01:53 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.