Django Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago ..or Gareth Edwrds who shot the Creator on an FX3. But I agree the cinema world is super conservative with ARRI sitting firmly on top. TV, docu & indie is a more crowded market but there are big players: RED, BM, Canon C & Sony FX. I'm not sure who the target of this Fuji Eterna will be, its gotta be super niche. It's kind of the camera nobody asked for. Medium format sounds great but if you're going to have poor rolling shutter with razor thin DoF plus huge lenses, I don't see many applications where this would warrant such an investment. I've said this a while ago, but my dream for Fuji is that they revive their old school Fujica system with hand grip a la Bolex. Modernise it with pro I/O and an EVF/flip screen but keep the form factor and essence. Place the XH2S sensor with built-in cooling and an E-ND. It could even be vertical sensor default and it would switch if you rotate 90 degrees. That might make people cringe but the camera would be a hit in wide segments (think X100 craze). And if anyone can go quirky/retro/legacy its Fuji X: Ninpo33 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulioD Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 9 hours ago, ND64 said: Its not like gaming PC that you overclock a bit and gain some extra performance. The sensor should support that specific read out capacity. Yes. No way are they getting anything much better from what this sensor already does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eatstoomuchjam Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 9 hours ago, ND64 said: Its not like gaming PC that you overclock a bit and gain some extra performance. The sensor should support that specific read out capacity. Wrong. There are plenty of examples of overclocking various sensors over the years. You can find them using a little-known research tool called "google." You might try that in the future before responding. Just like a computer, overclocking a sensor can lead to increased power consumption, increased heat (leading to more noise), and instability. Here's one example. https://wiki.edgertronic.com/wiki/Overclock Increased power consumption and heat are hard to deal with in a hybrid camera body which takes a single fairly small battery and has no fan. They're easier to deal with on a larger camera with integrated cooling fan and a v-mount battery (judging by the pictures, the camera uses them natively). Ninpo33 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulioD Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago Only if the sensor supports those modes. It’s not overclocking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninpo33 Posted 12 hours ago Author Share Posted 12 hours ago 13 minutes ago, JulioD said: Only if the sensor supports those modes. It’s not overclocking. And you know for a fact that this sensor doesn’t support any tweaks/adjustments or the ability to improve performance? Please post a link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ND64 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 4 hours ago, Ninpo33 said: And you know for a fact that this sensor doesn’t support any tweaks/adjustments or the ability to improve performance? That tweaks/adjustments are hardware changes, and needs redoing a lot of stuff at fab level. It's not like you edit a few lines of code and get a more capable sensor. Does GFX100II sensor support different modes of read out? Who knows.. But if there is any, thats not simple as "let the sensor consume more power". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eatstoomuchjam Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 46 minutes ago, ND64 said: That tweaks/adjustments are hardware changes, and needs redoing a lot of stuff at fab level. It's not like you edit a few lines of code and get a more capable sensor. Does GFX100II sensor support different modes of read out? Who knows.. But if there is any, thats not simple as "let the sensor consume more power". Good job redefining the argument so that you can be right. Literally nobody said "edit a few lines of code" or "let the sensor consume more power." You win today's gold star for bad faith argument loss tactics. Ninpo33 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ND64 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 4 hours ago, eatstoomuchjam said: Good job redefining the argument so that you can be right. Literally nobody said "edit a few lines of code" or "let the sensor consume more power." You win today's gold star for bad faith argument loss tactics. Dude its not abortion ban subject. You just need to learn more about sensors, even their datasheet can help, and you'll find out. "Literally nobody said let the sensor consume more power"? Really? This is your exact words: "Wrong. There are plenty of examples of overclocking various sensors over the years". Unless we assume you're "nobody". Fair enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.