EOS R5 or Z6 Mark III?

[ArashM]

6 hours ago, MrSMW said:

And I have looked at every bit of kit out there, at least on paper and in reviews and there just isn't a single brand that ticks every box and I just find that odd.

Why can we only burn a LUT into Lumix (and I think Fuji)?

Why are your rear LCD's so shit Sony, unless A7RV and above?

Why can we only write video to a single card slot Nikon.

Why Canon is everything so big, heavy and expensive...except your R3 which is very light for what it is?

Why are your cakes so dry Leica you fucktards?

WOW you sum up my feelings so well!

[MrSMW]

41 minutes ago, ArashM said:

WOW you sum up my feelings so well!

It's like they have some kind of gentleman's agreement to each be shit somewhere. 

[Chrille]

8 hours ago, MrSMW said:

econdary stills plus hybrid = Zf. If I had the brass, it would be Leica Q3 43mm, despite their shit customer service, lack of chairs and dry cake. It ticks every box for me in that regard except one and that is purchase price. Even at €3k, I'd struggle, but it's twice that, so my Zf is my 'Poor Man's Leica Q3'.

Still wondering about the Nikon ZF. How is the video mode? Colourscience looks good, but how can i judge from YouTube…

[eatstoomuchjam]

You can rent it or walk into a camera store and ask them to let you play for a few minutes and then you can judge from your own footage. 

[MrSMW]

11 hours ago, Chrille said:

Still wondering about the Nikon ZF. How is the video mode? Colourscience looks good, but how can i judge from YouTube…

Also look at any Z6II material. It's the same sensor etc. It's just a better camera for AF etc...

[Chrille]

Okay, i read @Andrew Reid extra thread on the Nikon ZF compared to the  Z6II and the Leica...

 

Thanks!